Objective:
To create a Bedside PICC Service (BPS) to increase placement of bedside peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) patients.
Design:
Two phase observational, pre-post design.
Setting:
Single-center quaternary non-cardiac PICU.
Patients:
All patients admitted to the PICU.
Interventions:
From June 1, 2015 to May 31, 2017 a BPS team was created (Phase I) and expanded (Phase II) as part of a quality improvement initiative. A multi-disciplinary team developed a PICC evaluation tool (PICU PET) to identify amenable patients and to suggest location and provider for procedure performance. Outcome, process and balancing metrics were evaluated.
Results:
BPS placed 130/493 (26%) PICC lines resulting in 2447 hospital central line days. A shift in bedside PICC centerline proportion occurred during both Phases. Median time from order to line placement was reduced for PICCs placed by BPS compared to placement in IR [6h (IQR 2h-23h) vs. 34h (IQR 19h-61h), p<0.001].
Successful access was achieved by BPS providers in 96% of patients with central tip position in 97%. BPS central line-associated blood stream infection (CLABSI) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) rates were similar to rates for PICCs placed in IR (All CLABSI 1.23 vs. 2.18, p=0.37; VTE 1.63 vs. 1.57, p=0.91). PICC lines in PICU patients had reduced VTE rate compared to PICU temporary catheter rate (1.59 vs. 5.36, p<0.001).
Conclusion:
BPS implementation increased bedside PICC placement and employed a patient-centered and timely process. Balancing metrics including CLABSI and VTE rates were not significantly different between PICC lines placed by BPS and those placed in IR.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.