Conventional norms that test presumably normal elderly individuals at one point in time may include preclinical cases of dementia and therefore may be less sensitive to the presence of dementia (Sliwinski, Lipton, Buschke, & Stewart, 1996). A sample of presumably normal African American and White rural community older adults (first reported in Marcopulos, McLain, & Giuliano, 1997) were retested after approximately 4 years to develop "robust" norms for the Mini Mental State Examination, Mattis Dementia Rating Scale Fuld Object Memory Evaluation, WAIS-R Vocabulary and Block Design, Wechsler Memory Scale - Revised Logical Memory and Visual Reproduction, Raven's Colored Progressive Matrices, and Clock Drawing Test. Ninety-four out of the original 133 participants were located and agreed to be retested. Twelve of the participants retested at Time 2 showed significant decline on testing relative to their own baseline and were dropped from the recalculated norms. Participants who declined on testing tended to be older, less educated, had lower WAIS-R scores on Vocabulary and Block Design combined, had poorer IADLs and were less socially active. There was no difference in physical health status or level of depression. Recalculated group means showed little change when the participants who declined had been removed, but this left very few participants at the extremes of age (>85 years) and education (<4 years). It appears that the incidence of cognitive decline in this sample is comparable to other community samples of cognitive decline and dementia. Results are discussed in light of the practical difficulties of identifying preclinical dementia for deriving robust norms, implications for the theory of cognitive reserve, risk of cognitive decline in persons with low education and/or low premorbid mental ability and the clinical utility of utilizing education-corrected norms.
This study examined the relationship between neuropsychological functioning, activities of daily living, and social interaction in a biracial sample of 133 rural community-dwelling participants with fewer than 10 years of education, who were tested twice over 4 years as part of a normative study. Neuropsychological tests predicted self-reported IADL and social functioning at Time 1 after accounting for age, education, health, depression, and gender. Physical health and the Initiation and Perseveration subscale of the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale best predicted instrumental activities of daily living. Social functioning was best predicted by gender and delayed memory recall from the Fuld Object Memory Evaluation. Functional independence and social activities declined slightly over time for all participants, but those whose neuropsychological test scores declined significantly at Time 2 reported less independence and fewer social activities at Time 1 than those participants whose cognition remained stable. Ecological and concurrent validity of self-report measures of functional status and neuropsychological testing in predicting cognitive decline are discussed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.