No abstract

This paper reflects on some of the ethical challenges encountered by the authors whilst undertaking sensitive qualitative research with parents and children who are traditionally hard to reach. The research aimed to provide more holistic and in-depth accounts of parenting on a low income in diverse social circumstances than already exist. The nature of the sample and the subject matter that was covered inevitably raised many familiar ethical dilemmas and some that are less often encountered in practice, particularly in relation to child protection. In this article we discuss our approach to ethics, some of the ethical challenges we encountered undertaking work with families and discuss the complexity of decision-making around risk of harm to children. We conclude that a clear framework to avoid harm should be developed at the outset and a transparent approach to child protection issues should be used. Additional time and resources need to be incorporated at the planning stage of similar projects in order to develop appropriate methods, ensure effective decision-making and support researchers.

No abstract

No abstract

This paper reflects on a project which involved the authors working in partnership with a working group of looked after children and young people established by a small unitary local authority to develop a pledge defining what support, services and care looked after children can expect from them. The authors aimed to develop an approach which ensured that the young people's voices were heard and also that the well-being of those involved as participants remained at the centre of the process throughout. We argue that Honneth's theory of recognition, which identifies three forms of recognition as important to ensure that human beings feel assured of their dignity or integrity -in brief love, rights and solidarity -offers a useful framework for achieving this. The main principles which emerged were: (i) building the research around the young people's existing relationships, (ii) respecting the group's decisions and (iii) honouring the views expressed.