High-throughput proteomic studies of archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues have the potential to be a powerful tool for examining the clinical course of disease. However, advances in FFPE tissue-based proteomics have been hampered by inefficient methods to extract proteins from archival tissue and by an incomplete knowledge of formaldehyde-induced modifications in proteins. To help address these problems, we have developed a procedure for the formation of 'tissue surrogates' to model FFPE tissues. Cytoplasmic proteins, such as lysozyme or ribonuclease A, at concentrations approaching the protein content in whole cells, are fixed with 10% formalin to form gelatin-like plugs. These plugs have sufficient physical integrity to be processed through graded alcohols, xylene, and embedded in paraffin according to standard histological procedures. In this study, we used tissue surrogates formed from one or two proteins to evaluate extraction protocols for their ability to quantitatively extract proteins from the surrogates. Optimal protein extraction was obtained using a combination of heat, a detergent, and a protein denaturant. The addition of a reducing agent did not improve protein recovery; however, recovery varied significantly with pH. Protein extraction of 480% was observed for pH 4 buffers containing 2% (w/v) sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) when heated at 1001C for 20 min, followed by incubation at 601C for 2 h. SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of the extracted proteins revealed that the surrogate extracts contained a mixture of monomeric and multimeric proteins, regardless of the extraction protocol employed. Additionally, protein extracts from surrogates containing carbonic anhydrase:lysozyme (1:2 mol/mol) had disproportionate percentages of lysozyme, indicating that selective protein extraction in complex multiprotein systems may be a concern in proteomic studies of FFPE tissues.
Site-directed mutagenesis and design of Zn(2+)-binding centers have been used to determine a set of specific tertiary interactions between the mu-opioid receptor, a rhodopsin-like G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), and its cyclic peptide agonist ligand, Tyr(1)-c(S-Et-S)[d-Cys(2)-Phe(3)-d-Pen(4)]NH(2) (JOM6). The binding affinity of the tetrapeptide is strongly dependent on the nature of its first and third residues and on substitutions at positions 213, 216, 237, 300, 315, and 318 of the mu-opioid receptor. His(1) and His(3) analogues of the ligand were able to form metal-binding complexes with the V300C and G213C/T315C receptor mutants, respectively. Direct contact of the Phe(3) residue of JOM6 with Gly(213), Asp(216), Thr(315), and Trp(318) of the receptor was suggested by the binding affinities of His(3)-, Nle(3)-, Leu(3)-, Aci(3)-, Delta(E)Phe(3)-, and Delta(Z)Phe(3)-substituted peptides with the G213C/T315C, D216V, T315C, and W318L mutants. The improved binding affinity of the free carboxylate analogue of JOM6 for binding to the E229D mutant revealed an interaction between the C-terminal group of the peptide and Glu(229) of the receptor. The experimental constraints that were obtained were applied for distance geometry modeling of the mu-receptor in complex with the tetrapeptide agonist ligand, JOM6. The active conformation of the opioid receptor was calculated using the crystal structure of "inactive" rhodopsin and published engineered and intrinsic metal-binding sites and disulfide bonds that allow or facilitate activation of GPCRs. Interhelical H-bonds existing in the mu-receptor were applied as additional distance constraints. The calculated model of the receptor-ligand complex can serve as a prototype of the active state for all rhodopsin-like GPCRs. It displays a strongly shifted transmembrane helix 6 (TM6) and reorientation of the conserved Trp(293) residue in TM6 upon its interaction with the agonist. Importantly, the binding pockets of the active and inactive states are not identical, which implies distinct interaction modes of agonists and antagonists. In the active state, the binding pocket of the mu-receptor is complementary to the previously proposed receptor-bound conformation of JOM6.
Opioid receptor binding conformations for two structurally related, conformationally constrained tetrapeptides, JOM-6 ( micro receptor selective) and JOM-13 (delta receptor selective), were deduced using conformational analysis of these ligands and analogs with additional conformational restrictions. Docking of these ligands in their binding conformations to opioid receptor structural models, based upon the published rhodopsin X-ray structure, implicates specific structural features of the micro and delta receptor ligand binding sites as forming the basis for the micro selectivity of JOM-6 and the delta selectivity of JOM-13. In particular, the presence of E229 in the micro receptor (in place of the corresponding D210 of the delta receptor) causes an adverse electrostatic interaction with C-terminal carboxylate-containing ligands, resulting in the observed preference of ligands with an uncharged C-terminus for the micro receptor. In addition, the requirement that the Phe3 side chain of JOM-13 assume a gauche orientation for optimal delta binding, whereas the Phe3 side chain of JOM-6 must be in a trans orientation for high-affinity micro binding can be largely attributed to the steric effect of replacement of L300 of the delta receptor by W318 of the micro receptor. Testing this hypothesis by examining the binding of JOM-6 and several of its key analogs with specific micro receptor mutants is described. Our initial results are consistent with the proposed ligand-receptor interaction models.
Publication of the rhodopsin X-ray structure has facilitated the development of homology models of other G protein-coupled receptors. However, possible shifts of transmembrane (TM) alpha helices, expected variations in helical distortions, and differences in loop size necessitate experimental verification of these comparative models. To refine a rhodopsin-based homology model of the mu-opioid receptor (MOR), we experimentally determined structural-distance constraints from intrinsic and engineered metal-binding sites in the rat MOR. Investigating the relatively high intrinsic affinity of MOR for Zn(2+) (IC(50) approximately 30microM), we observed that mutation of His(319) (TM7) abolished Zn(2+) inhibition of ligand binding, while mutation of Asp(216) (extracellular loop 2) decreased the effect of Zn(2+), suggesting these residues participate in the intrinsic Zn(2+)-binding center of MOR. To verify the relative orientation of TM5 and TM6 and to examine whether a rhodopsin-like alpha aneurism is present in TM5, we engineered Zn(2+)-binding centers by mutating residues of TM5 and TM6 to Cys or His, making use of the native His(297) in TM6 as an additional Zn(2+)-coordination site. Inhibition of opioid ligand binding by Zn(2+) suggests that residues Ile(234) and Phe(237) in TM5 face the binding-site crevice and form a metal-binding center with His(297) and Val(300) in TM6. This observation is inconsistent with a rhodopsin-like structure, which would locate Ile(234) on the lipid-exposed side of TM5, too distant from other residues making up the Zn(2+)-binding site. Subsequent distance geometry refinement of the MOR model indicates that the rhodopsin-like alpha aneurism is likely absent in TM2 but present in TM5.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.