No abstract

"Change-in-support" (CIS) balance-recovery reactions that involve rapid stepping or reaching movements play a critical role in preventing falls; however, age-related deficits in the neuro-musculoskeletal systems may impede ability to execute these reactions effectively. This review describes four new interventions aimed at reducing fall risk in older adults by promoting more effective CIS reactions: (1) balance training, (2) balance-enhancing footwear, (3) safer mobility aids, and (4) handrail cueing systems. The training program uses unpredictable support-surface perturbations to counter specific CIS control problems associated with aging and fall risk. Pilot testing has demonstrated that the program is well-tolerated by balance-impaired older adults, and a randomized controlled trial is now in progress. The balance-enhancing footwear insole improves control of stepping reactions by compensating for age-related loss of plantar cutaneous sensation. In a clinical trial, subjects wore the insole for 12 weeks with no serious problems and no habituation of the balance-enhancing benefits. The mobility-aid intervention involves changes to the design of pickup walkers so as to reduce impediments to lateral stepping. Finally, work is underway to investigate the effectiveness of handrail cueing in attracting attention to the rail and ensuring that the brain registers its location, thereby facilitating more rapid and accurate grasping.

Study design: Observational cohort study. Objectives: To evaluate ongoing health and community reintegration of patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation in Nepal. Setting: Nepal. Methods: This study follows a cohort of 37 patients with SCI in Nepal, 1-2 years after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation in 2007. Participants were visited at home and data were obtained through semi-structured interviews that evaluated health, independence in daily living (Modified Barthel Index), community participation (Participation Scale) and barriers due to socioeconomic issues, housing, accessibility, and availability and use of mobility aids. Results: One-quarter of the cohort had died (35% of wheelchair users). Secondary health concerns, such as pressure ulcers and urinary tract infections, were common in the 24 patients interviewed, and eight had been rehospitalized to treat them. Inappropriate wheelchairs, inadequate housing and rugged terrain restricted accessibility. 80% of wheelchair users could not enter their homes independently and 74% of those who were using mobility aids could not access the community independently because of the physical terrain. Of all those who were interviewed, half had no accessible toilet, access to a water source or road access to their home. Community participation was a challenge for most using mobility devices, and less than half earned any income. Conclusion: This study identifies important areas of focus for rehabilitation centres in less-resourced contexts like Nepal to help with reintegration after discharge: vocational training during or after rehabilitation; accessible housing; wheelchairs appropriate to the terrain and the need for strong community-based rehabilitation.

Introduction Wheelchair users with spinal cord injury are at a high risk of falls. However, the perspectives of wheelchair users with spinal cord injury on their fall circumstances and their preferences for fall prevention strategies/interventions remain understudied. Therefore, we aimed to: a) describe the circumstances of falls experienced by wheelchair users with spinal cord injury over a six-month period, b) explore their perspectives of why falls occurred in certain situations, and c) explore their perspectives on recommended content/structure of fall prevention strategies/interventions. Methods This sequential explanatory mixed methods study had two phases. Phase I involved tracking of falls experienced by wheelchair users with spinal cord injury over six months, in which participants completed a survey after experiencing a fall to track the number/circumstance of each fall. Data from the surveys were descriptively reported. Phase II involved a photovoice focus group discussion of the survey findings and their preferences for fall prevention strategies/interventions. Data from the focus group discussion were analyzed using a thematic analysis. Results Thirty-two participants completed phase I. More than half of the participants fell at least once in six months. Falls commonly occurred in the afternoon during a transfer, or when participants were wheeling over uneven ground. One-third of the falls caused an injury. Eleven