Cannabinoid receptor (CB1) agonists strongly inhibit behavioral responses to acute noxious stimuli, but their effects on behavioral responses in persistent pain states are less clear. Here, we examined the effects of intrathecal (i.t.) administration of a CB1 agonist, WIN55,212-2, on mechanical allodynia (decreased withdrawal threshold) produced by injections of complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA) in the plantar surface of the rat hindpaw. We measured mechanical thresholds with calibrated von Frey filaments before and after CFA and used Fos expression as a marker of the activity of spinal cord neurons during inflammation and in response to a CB1 antagonist. One day post CFA-induced injury, mechanical sensitivity was significantly increased in the hindpaw ipsilateral to the CFA injection, as was the number of neurons that express Fos. Intrathecal injection of WIN55,212-2, significantly, reversed the allodynia at doses that had no effect on the mechanical threshold of the contralateral paw of CFA-treated or the withdrawal thresholds in naive animals. This effect was blocked by coadministration of the CB1 antagonist, SR141716A, with WIN55212-2. By itself, SR141716A, had no effect on mechanical thresholds in normal animals. In inflamed animals, SR141716A did not further reduce mechanical thresholds in the inflamed paw, but it significantly enhanced mechanical sensitivity 'contralateral' to the inflammation. Furthermore, i.t. injection of SR141716A increased Fos expression in both normal and inflamed animals, to a different extent in different laminae. In normal animals, the increase was primarily in laminae V-VI and in the ventral horn; in animals with persistent inflammation SR141716A increased the number of Fos neurons in laminae I-II and V-VI. These results demonstrate that WIN55212-2 reverses inflammation-induced allodynia at doses that do not produce analgesia and that SR141716A differentially affects the pattern of Fos expression in the spinal cord, depending on the presence or absence of inflammation. Taken together, these results suggest that the CB1 receptor system is tonically active in the spinal cord under normal conditions and that its activity is increased in response to injury.

Although many pharmacological studies indicate that bulbospinal noradrenergic projections contribute to antinociception, lesions of the major brainstem noradrenergic cell groups have provided conflicting evidence. Here we used a new immunotoxin, anti-dopamine beta-hydroxylase-saporin, to re-examine the contribution of noradrenergic pathways to nociception and to morphine analgesia. We treated rats intrathecally by lumbar puncture with the immunotoxin and examined dopamine beta-hydroxylase (DbetaH) immunoreactivity seven and 14 days after treatment. There was no change in DbetaH staining at 7 days; however, 14 days after treatment we demonstrated significant destruction of noradrenergic neurons in the locus coeruleus and in the A5 and A7 cell groups. There was a concomitant loss of noradrenergic axons in the dorsal and ventral horns of the lumbosacral and cervical cord. Consistent with the lack of anatomical changes, we found no difference in nociceptive responses in the hot-plate, tail-flick or formalin tests one week post-toxin. On day 14 we examined the behavioral response to injection of formalin into the hindpaw and found that responses during the second phase of pain behavior were significantly reduced. There was no change during the first phase. Formalin-evoked fos expression in the spinal cord was also reduced. We also evaluated morphine analgesia in the formalin test and found that toxin-treated animals exhibited enhanced morphine analgesia. These results establish the utility of using this immunotoxin to selectively destroy subpopulations of noradrenergic cell groups and provide evidence that acute and persistent nociception are differentially regulated by descending noradrenergic pathways.