ObjectivesTo compare implant and prosthesis survival rates between full‐arch immediate prostheses supported by 4 hydrophilic implants with bicortical anchorage and by 5 or 6 hydrophilic implants placed without bicortical anchorage.Material and MethodsThe sample was retrospectively selected and comprised completely edentulous patients treated with full‐arch immediate prostheses supported by Morse Taper hydrophilic implants. The selected patients were divided into four groups, according to the region of implant placement and type of anchorage. Differences in implant and prosthesis survival rates between groups, as well as the influence of bicortical anchorage on implant primary stability, were verified using Fisher's exact tests (significant at p < .05).ResultsThe sample comprised 392 implants, 72 were placed in the maxilla with bicortical anchorage, and 85 were placed without. In the mandible, 140 implants were placed with and 95 were placed without bicortical anchorage. The follow‐up period was up to 24 months. A 98.8% implant survival rate was observed for the group of implants placed without bicortical anchorage in the maxilla, and of 100% for the other groups. The overall implant survival rate was 99.7% (391 of 392 implants). Prosthesis survival rate was 100% for all groups. No differences were observed between groups with respect to implant and prosthesis survival rates. Significantly higher primary stability was observed for implants placed with bicortical anchorage in both jaws.ConclusionPredictable results and high survival rates were achieved within the period evaluated by the present retrospective study, with immediate full‐arch prostheses when only four hydrophilic implants are placed bicortically.

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate implant and prosthesis survival rates in full-arch rehabilitation supported by implants with platform-switched Morse taper connection submitted to immediate or delayed loading, after up to 5 years of follow-up. Material and Methods: Data was retrospectively collected from clinical records of patients who were treated by means of implant-supported full-arch rehabilitation. Survival rates of implants and prostheses were evaluated according to immediate or delayed loading. Results: The sample comprised 967 implants. Of those, 627 were submitted to immediate loading (IL) while 340 to delayed loading (DL). After a follow-up period of up to 5 years, the implant survival rate for IL was of 99.7% (622/627 implants) and 97.2% (333/340 implants) for DL. The overall implant survival rate was 98.8% (955/967 implants). Prosthesis survival rate was 100% (N = 178) for both groups. Significantly more implants in the DL group presented bone loss (p > 0.01), either greater or lower than 2 mm, during the follow-up period. Conclusion: Within their limits, the present results suggest that full-arch rehabilitation with platform-switched Morse taper connection implants can lead to surgical and prosthetic predictable outcomes. Moreover, immediate loading protocol seems to be a good option for the rehabilitation of fully edentulous patients, as it involves a shorter treatment time, which may lead to greater patient satisfaction.   Keywords Dental implants; Rehabilitation; Survival rate; Retrospective study.

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the long-term predictability of treatment using implants with hydrophobic and hydrophilic surfaces, according to clinical parameters and survival rates. Records from all patients who received dental implants between January 2013 and December 2014 at ILAPEO College were fully evaluated by two graduate dentists. Records with incomplete or unclear data were excluded from the study. The variables evaluated were demographic data, design of implants and prosthetic components, type of loading, data related to the patients' general health, and survival of implants and prostheses. The final retrospective sample comprised 776 patients with 2707 implants, with up to 5 years of follow-up. Survival rates of implants and prostheses were 97.93% and 98.77%, respectively. Implants with hydrophobic (97.87%) and hydrophilic (98.34%) surfaces exhibited similar survival rates. Considering the different types of loading, there was no statistically significant difference between loading protocols regarding implant survival rates. Unsuitable healing capacity, uncooperative and not motivated patient, loss of prosthesis, and peri-implant bone loss were confirmed statistically to be factors that may contribute to implant loss, according to hazard ratio and odds ratio. The present study showed similar and high overall survival rates for implant with both types of surfaces, in the long term. The surface treatment, implant model and loading protocol had no significant influence on implant loss. Therefore, the evaluated implant systems were able to offer a high predictability for both hydrophobic and hydrophilic implants.

No abstract

A instalação imediata de implantes em região estética é uma prática frequente, pois reduzir a remodelação óssea e tecidual. Os implantes com interface cone Morse apresentam resultados biológicos e estéticos satisfatórios a longo prazo, pois apresentam gap reduzido entre implante e componente protético e a interface fica distante do tecido ósseo. Este artigo tem como objetivo relatar a reabilitação estética de um incisivo central superior comprometido através da instalação de um implante cone Morse utilizando a técnica da cirurgia guiada com provisionalização imediata. Paciente com 40 anos de idade, do sexo masculino, apresentava incisivo central superior (#21) com tratamento endodôntico prévio, recessão gengival vestibular, escurecimento coronário e mobilidade. O caso clínico apresentado mostrou que, após 12 meses, resultados precisos e estéticos são possíveis de alcançar com a instalação de implantes em alvéolos pós-extração e instalação de um dente provisório imediato em regiões estéticas.