The treatment of very elderly patients (≥70 years) with acute myeloid leukemia remains controversial. We present here 302 patients seen over a 14-year period in order to understand the real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in this patient population. Less than 25% of patients achieved a complete remission. The median overall survival was 12.4, 11.5 and 2.6 months, with a 3-year rates of 27%, 17% and 6%, for non-acute promyelocytic leukemia patients receiving intensive chemotherapy, lower-intensity therapy or best supportive care (BSC), respectively. In all ages, results were not significantly different among patients receiving low-intensity therapy and intensive chemotherapy, but significantly worse in those treated with BSC only. Similarly, intensive chemotherapy and low-intensity therapy gave better survival rates than BSC in patients with favorable- or intermediate-risk cytogenetics and in those with unfavorable cytogenetics (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.04, respectively).

ObjectiveWhat is the proportion of antibodies to myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG-Ab) in optic neuritis (ON) in adults and what would be the ON presentation for which MOG-Ab should be tested?MethodsMulticentric prospective study conducted during 1 year on all patients diagnosed with acute ON in all ophthalmological units in hospitals in a region in western France.ResultsSixty-five patients were included. MOG-Ab prevalence was 14% (9/65) during an acute ON and 13% (7/55) after exclusion of patients already diagnosed with multiple sclerosis (MS) (8) or MOG+ON (2). Compared with MS and clinically isolated syndrome, MOG+ON had no female preponderance (67% of men in case of MOG+ON and 22% of men in case of MS and clinically isolated syndrome, p<0.05) were more often bilateral (44% vs 3%, p<0.005) and associated with optic disc swelling (ODS) (78% vs 14%, p<0.001). To predict MOG+ON, the positive predictive values (PPVs) of male sex, ODS and bilateral involvement were 29% (95% CI 9% to 48%), 41% (95% CI 18% to 65%) and 40% (95% CI 10% to 70%), respectively, while the negative predictive values (NPV) were 93% (95% CI 86% to 100%), 96% (95% CI 90% to 100%) and 91% (95% CI 83% to 99%), respectively. The combined factor ‘ODS or bilateral or recurrent ON’ was the best compromise between PPV (31% (95% CI 14% to 48%)) and NPV (100% (95% CI 100% to 100%)).ConclusionAmong ON episodes, MOG-Ab were found in 14% of cases. MOG+ON occurred without female preponderance and was significantly associated with ODS and/or bilateral ON. Testing MOG-Ab only in patients presenting with ODS or bilateral or recurrent ON would limit MOG-Ab tests to fewer than half of all patients without the risk of missing any MOG+ON cases.

The absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) at presentation has been associated with survival in various malignancies. However, its prognostic value in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has not been established. In a series of 1702 newly diagnosed patients with AML, we evaluated the prognostic value of ALC at diagnosis with regard to induction chemotherapy response, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Low initial ALC (< 1 × 10(9)/L) appeared as a poor prognostic factor for DFS (p = 0.01) and OS (p = 0.02), while higher ALC (> 4.5 × 10(9)/L) showed a lower response rate after one (p = 0.004) or two induction chemotherapy courses (p = 0.01). However, ALC did not appear as an independent predictor of outcome in a multivariate analysis model also including age, cytogenetics and white blood cell count. Examination of lymphocyte subsets is warranted to specify the relationship between ALC at diagnosis and clinical outcome in AML.

SUMMARYBackground: In patients over age 60 with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), cure rates are under 10% despite intensive chemotherapy. These patients often have comorbidities, and their treatment must be chosen with care. For those who are not candidates for intensive chemotherapy, one of the available options for palliative treatment should be chosen on the basis of an individual risk-benefit assessment.

Background : ENA is a selective inhibitor of IDH2 approved in the US for the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory IDH2 mutated AML. Little is known on its efficacy in patients with IDH2m myelodysplastic syndromes. Here we report the preliminary results of a Phase 2 study evaluating the safety and efficacy of ENA in three different cohorts of MDS : Higher risk MDS having failed HMA (cohort A, n=29), untreated higher risk MDS without life threatening cytopenias (ie ANC &lt; 500/mm3 or any recent severe infections and/or platelets below 30,000/mm3 and any bleeding symptom, cohort B, with the addition of AZA in non-Responders after 3 cycles, n=29) and lower risk MDS having failed ESA (cohort C, n=10). (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03744390). Methods : Subjects enrolled in cohort A, B or C received continuous 28-day cycles of ENA - 100 mg PO QD. In cohort B, Azacitidine (75 mg/m2/d x 7 days, SC) was added to Enasidenib after 3 cycles, only in the absence of IWG 2006 response (absence of CR, PR or HI). The primary endpoint was Overall hematological response (including CR, PR,stable disease with HI according to IWG 2006). All patients who achieved CR, PR or HI were considered as responders and could continue treatment until loss of response. Secondary endpoints of the trial included safety,duration of response, EFS, Overall survival and translational project evaluating the role of biomarkers on response.We report interim results in the first 26 pts enrolled. Resul t s : At data cut off (6/15/2021), 45 pts were enrolled, including 26 who were evaluable for the primary endpoint. 11, 9 and 6 were enrolled in cohort A, B and C respectively. Median age was 75.5 years and 34.6% were female. WHO was MDS-MLD, MDS-RS-SLD, MDS-RS-MLD, MDS-EB1, MDS-EB2, CMML and AML (with 20-30% blast) in 1, 2, 3,4, 10, 2 and 4 pts, respectively. IPSS was low, intermediate 1, int 2 and high in 1, 7, 13, 5 resp. IPSS-R was low,intermediate, high and very high in 4, 8, 11, 3 resp. At data cut off, 10 pts were still on treatment. Most common reasons for discontinuing ENA were Treatment failure (7.7%), disease progression (23.1%), adverse events (7.7%) and death (3.8%). Three patients experienced a differentiation syndrome (1 in cohort A and 2 in cohort B) that resolved without sequelae. Other most common grade 3-4 AEs were nausea/diarrhea (n=4) and thrombocytopenia (n=5). Overall best response rate (ORR including CR, PR, and HI) was achieved in 11 pts (42 %), including 6 CR (55%), 2 PR (18%), 2 mCR with HI (18%), 1 Stable disease with HI (9%). ORR was achieved in 3 (27 %), 5 (56 %) and 3 (50%)in cohort A, B and C respectively. In cohort B, AZA wad added to ENA in 3 patients who were primarily resistant to ENA. Among them, 2/3 patients subsequently achieved a response. Moreover, CR was seen in 2, 1 and 3 in cohort A, B and C respectively. The 6 months response rate was 29.5 % [6 ;59], 53.1 % [11.7 ;83] and 50 % [7.7 ;82.9] in cohort A, B and C respectively. At the time of analysis, all responses but 2 were sustained. Responses were lower (p=0.27) among the 23 pts with IDH2 R140 (30.4%) as compared to the 3 with IDH2 R172 mutation (66.7%). With a median follow up of 8.6 months, the median OS was 17.3 months (figure 1). Six patients died during follow-up, including 4/11 in cohort A, 1/9 in cohort B and 1/6 in cohort C. The 6 months death rate observed was 8.2 % [0 ;18.4] and the 1-year OS was 55.4%, 100% and 80% in cohorts A, B and C, respectively. Four patients evolved to AML (2 and 2 in cohort A and B) with a 1y risk of AML of 19.3%. Conclusion : Results from the first 26 patients included in this study show that ENA has no limiting toxicity in patients with MDS and that it can provide responses in 42% of patients. These responses appear to be encouraging, especially in first-line (low and high risk) patients. An update of this study will be presented. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Ades: JAZZ: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Sebert: BMS: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy. Stamatoulas Bastard: Pfizer: Other: Travel Support; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Laribi: Novartis: Other: Personal Fees, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Other: Personal Fees; BeiGene: Other: Personal Fees; Takeda: Other: Personal Fees, Research Funding; Jansen: Research Funding; Le Mans Hospital: Research Funding; IQONE: Other: Personal Fees; AbbVie: Other: Personal Fees, Research Funding; Astellas Phama, Inc.: Other: Personal Fees. Vey: Amgen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; BIOKINESIS: Consultancy, Research Funding; NOVARTIS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; SERVIER: Consultancy; JAZZ PHARMACEUTICALS: Honoraria; JANSSEN: Consultancy. Platzbecker: AbbVie: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Geron: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Fenaux: Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; JAZZ: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Syros Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. OffLabel Disclosure: enasidenib is not approved for MDS