Objective: In 2015, the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) proposed a new definition of status epilepticus (SE): 5 minutes of ongoing seizure activity to diagnose convulsive SE (CSE, ie, bilateral tonic-clonic SE) and 10 minutes for focal SE and absence SE, rather than the earlier criterion of 30 minutes. Based on semiology, several types of SE with prominent motor phenomena at any time (including CSE) were distinguished from those without (ie, nonconvulsive SE, NCSE). We present the first population-based incidence study applying the new 2015 ILAE definition and classification of SE and report the impact of the evolution of semiology and level of consciousness (LOC) on outcome. Methods: We conducted a retrospective population-based incidence study of all adult patients with SE residing in the city of Salzburg between January 2011 and December 2015. Patients with hypoxic encephalopathy were excluded. SE was defined and classified according to the ILAE 2015. Results: We identified 221 patients with a median age of 69 years (range 20-99 years). The age-and sex-adjusted incidence of a first episode of SE, NCSE, and SE with prominent motor phenomena (including CSE) was 36.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] 26.2-48.5), 12.1 (95% CI 6.8-20.0), and 24.0 (95% CI 16.0-34.5; including CSE 15.8 [95% CI 9.4-24.8]) per 100 000 adults per year, respectively.None of the patients whose SE ended with or consisted of only bilateral tonic-clonic activity died. In all other clinical presentations, case fatality was lower in awake patients (8.2%) compared with patients with impaired consciousness (33%). Significance: This first population-based study using the ILAE 2015 definition and classification of SE found an increase of incidence of 10% compared to previous definitions. We also provide epidemiologic evidence that different patterns of status evolution and LOCs have strong prognostic implications.Leitinger and Trinka joint first authors ---

In refractory status epilepticus (SE), γ-aminobutyric acidergic drugs become less effective and glutamate plays a major role in seizure perpetuation. Data on the efficacy of perampanel (PER) in treatment of refractory SE in humans are limited. Here, we present a single-center case series of patients with refractory SE who received PER orally in an intensive care unit. We retrospectively analyzed treatment response, outcome, and adverse effects of all patients with refractory SE in our Neurological Intensive Care Unit who received add-on PER between September 2012 and February 2018. Thirty patients with refractory SE (median = 72 years, range = 18-91, 77% women) were included. In 14 patients (47%), a high-dose approach was used, with a median initial dose of 24 mg (range = 16-32). In five patients (17%), SE could be terminated after PER administration (median dose = 6 mg, range = 6-20 mg, 2/5 patients in high-dose group). Clinical response was observed after a median of 24 hours (range = 8-48 hours), whereas electroencephalogram resolved after a median of 60 hours (range = 12-72 hours). Time to treatment response tended to be shorter in patients receiving high-dose PER (median clinical response = 16 hours vs 18 hours; electroencephalographic response = 24 hours vs 72 hours), but groups were too small for statistical analysis. Continuous cardiorespiratory monitoring showed no changes in cardiorespiratory function after "standard" and "high-dose" treatment. Elevated liver enzymes without clinical symptoms were observed after a median of 6 days in seven of 30 patients (23%; 57% high dose vs 43% standard dose), of whom six also received treatment with phenytoin (PHT). Outcome was unfavorable (death, persistent vegetative state) in 13 patients (43%; 39% high dose vs 61% standard dose), and good recovery (no significant disability, moderate disability) was achieved in nine patients (56% high dose vs 44% standard dose). Oral PER in loading doses up to 32 mg were well tolerated but could terminate SE only in a few patients (5/30; 17%). Long duration of SE, route of administration, and severe underlying brain dysfunction might be responsible for the modest result. An intravenous formulation is highly desired to explore the full clinical utility in the treatment of refractory SE.

Brivaracetam (BRV) is a high-affinity synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A ligand that is structurally related to levetiracetam (LEV). Compared to LEV, its affinity to the ligand is >10%-30% higher. Due to its more lipophilic characteristics, it might have a quicker penetration across the blood-brain barrier and potentially also a stronger anticonvulsant effect. Thus, we aimed to explore its usefulness in the treatment of status epilepticus (SE). We retrospectively assessed treatment response and adverse events in adjunctive treatment with intravenous BRV in patients with SE from January 2016 to July 2017 at our institution. Seven patients aged median 68 years (range = 29-79) were treated with intravenous BRV. Three patients had SE with coma and four without. SE arose de novo in two patients; etiology was remote symptomatic in four patients and progressive symptomatic in one patient. The most frequent etiology was remote vascular in two patients. BRV was administered after median four antiepileptic drugs (range = 2-11). Time of treatment initiation ranged from 0.5 hours to 105 days (median = 10.5 hours). Immediate clinical and electrophysiological improvement was observed in two patients (29%). Median loading dose was 100 mg intravenously over 15 minutes (range = 50-200 mg), titrated up to a median dose of 100 mg/d (range = 100-300). Median Glasgow Outcome Scale score was 3 (range = 3-5), with an improvement in 86% of patients compared to admission. We observed no adverse events regarding cardiorespiratory function. BRV might have potential as a novel antiepileptic drug in early stages of SE. Its potential may lie its ability to cross the blood-brain barrier more quickly than LEV and its favorable safety profile. Prospective studies for the use of BRV in SE are required.