Purpose The purpose of this study was a comparison between osteoarthritis patients with primary hip and knee replacements before, during and after the first COVID-19 lockdown in Germany. Patients’ preoperative health status is assumed to decrease, owing to delayed surgeries. Costs for patients with osteoarthritis were assumed to increase, for example, due to higher prices for protective equipment. Hence, a comparison of patients treated before, during and after the first lockdown is conducted. Methods In total, 852 patients with primary hip or knee replacement were included from one hospital in Germany. Preoperative health status was measured with the WOMAC Score and the EQ-5D-5L. Hospital unit costs were calculated using a standardised cost calculation. Kruskal–Wallis tests and Chi-squared tests were applied for the statistical analyses. Results The mean of the preoperative WOMAC Score was slightly higher ( p < 0.01) for patients before the first lockdown, compared with patients afterwards. Means of the EQ-5D-5L were not significantly different regarding the lockdown status (NS). Length of stay was significantly reduced by approximately 1 day ( p < 0.001). Total inpatient hospital unit costs per patient and per day were significantly higher for patients during and after the first lockdown ( p < 0.001). Conclusion Preoperative health, measured with the WOMAC Score, worsened slightly for patients after the first lockdown compared with patients undergoing surgery before COVID-19. Preoperative health, measured using the EQ-5D-5L, was unaffected. Inpatient hospital unit costs increased significantly with the COVID-19 pandemic. Level of evidence Retrospective cohort study, III. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00167-022-06904-9.

Background Patient-reported outcomes are of ever-increasing importance in medical decision-making. The EQ-5D is one of the generic instruments measuring health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in arthroplasty. This review aimed to identify possible predictors of HRQoL changes for patients undergoing total knee replacements (TKR) or total hip replacements (THR). Methods A systematic literature review according to the PRISMA guidelines was conducted, searching several databases. Preoperative to postoperative HRQoL changes were evaluated in patients undergoing THR or TKR, using the EQ-5D visual analog scale (VAS) or the preference-based EQ-5D Index were evaluated. Articles were considered with prospectively or retrospectively collected data, as well as registry data, each with statistical analyses of patient-related factors. Results Eight hundred eighty-two articles were found, of which 21 studies met the inclusion criteria. Predictors were distinguished in alterable and non-alterable ones. The EQ-5D Index indicated a tendency towards beneficial improvements for patients with a high body mass index (BMI) (> 40) and no significant results for the VAS. Additionally, one study found that patient education and preoperative physiotherapy appeared to enhance HRQoL. Some evidence indicated that male gender was negatively associated with changes in the VAS and the EQ-5D Index, but one study reported the opposite. Changes in VAS and EQ-5D Index were lower for older patients, whereas a higher educational level seemed to be advantageous. A high Charnley class led to deteriorating changes in VAS, although a high Kellgren Lawrence classification was positively associated with the EQ-5D Index, in a limited number of studies. For all results, clinical relevance was calculated differently and mainly reported as uncertain or small. Conclusions The literature on this topic was weak and offers only limited guidance. Results for alterable predictors, such as the BMI, indicated valuable improvements for highly obese patients. Further, high-quality research is required to support medical decision-making. Level of evidence Level IV, according to the OCEBM Levels of Evidence Working Group.

Background A casemix classification based on patients’ needs can serve to better describe the patient group in palliative care and thus help to develop adequate future care structures and enable national benchmarking and quality control. However, in Germany, there is no such an evidence-based system to differentiate the complexity of patients’ needs in palliative care. Therefore, the study aims to develop a patient-oriented, nationally applicable complexity and casemix classification for adult palliative care patients in Germany. Methods COMPANION is a mixed-methods study with data derived from three subprojects. Subproject 1: Prospective, cross-sectional multi-centre study collecting data on patients’ needs which reflect the complexity of the respective patient situation, as well as data on resources that are required to meet these needs in specialist palliative care units, palliative care advisory teams, and specialist palliative home care. Subproject 2: Qualitative study including the development of a literature-based preliminary list of characteristics, expert interviews, and a focus group to develop a taxonomy for specialist palliative care models. Subproject 3: Multi-centre costing study based on resource data from subproject 1 and data of study centres. Data and results from the three subprojects will inform each other and form the basis for the development of the casemix classification. Ultimately, the casemix classification will be developed by applying Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analyses using patient and complexity data from subproject 1 and patient-related cost data from subproject 3. Discussion This is the first multi-centre costing study that integrates the structure and process characteristics of different palliative care settings in Germany with individual patient care. The mixed methods design and variety of included data allow for the development of a casemix classification that reflect on the complexity of the research subject. The consecutive inclusion of all patients cared for in participating study centres within the time of data collection allows for a comprehensive description of palliative care patients and their needs. A limiting factor is that data will be collected at least partly during the COVID-19 pandemic and potential impact of the pandemic on health care and the research topic cannot be excluded. Trial registration German Register for Clinical Studies trial registration number: DRKS00020517.