Chimney Swifts used at least 13 different deciduous and coniferous tree species. All of the trees were greater than 0.5 m diameter at breast height (DBH) and were described as hollow or having cavities. Nest or roost tree height was 12.7 ± 7.0 m (mean ± SD; range: 3.6-28.0 m; n = 25) and DBH was 1.0 m ± 0.5 m (range 0.5-2.1 m; n = 21). According to our description of used trees, the number of suitably hollow Chimney Swift nest or roost trees may be two to three times higher, although still rare, in most unlogged compared to logged hardwood forests. Whether the current total supply of suitable nest or roost trees is sufficient to carry the anticipated increase in use by Chimney Swifts as chimney habitat is modified or deteriorates is unknown. Monitoring the frequency of use of tree cavities by nesting and roosting Chimney Swifts over time, and more robustly quantifying the availability of suitable tree cavities in different forest types for nesting and roosting Chimney Swifts, particularly in unlogged versus logged forests, are fruitful areas for future research. . D'après la description des arbres occupés, le nombre d'arbres creux convenables pour la nidification ou le repos du Martinet ramoneur pourrait être de 2 à 3 fois plus élevé -quoique ces arbres sont quand même rares -dans la plupart des forêts de feuillus non-récoltées, comparativement aux forêts récoltées. Nous ne savons pas si la quantité actuelle d'arbres propices est suffisante pour satisfaire l'utilisation accrue anticipée par les Martinets ramoneurs vu la détérioration ou la destruction des cheminées. Le suivi temporel de la fréquence d'utilisation des cavités d'arbres par les martinets pour y nicher ou y dormir et une meilleure quantification de la disponibilité de cavités d'arbres propices dans différents types de forêts, en particulier les forêts intactes versus récoltées, sont des avenues de recherche prometteuses. Utilisation de cavités d'arbres par le Martinet ramoneur : incidence sur les plans de l'exploitation forestière et du rétablissement des populations

Since 1975, the diversity and abundance of colonial waterbirds breeding in Hamilton Harbour have increased, making it an important nesting site on the Great Lakes. An adaptive management approach has been employed to control hyper-abundant species and guide conservation efforts for vulnerable species, with the goal of maintaining a diverse waterbird community. Four species exhibited increasing or stable population trends (1975–2013): Double-crested Cormorants (Phalacrocorax auritus; from 0 to 4747 nests); Black-crowned Night-Herons (Nycticorax nycticorax; ranged from 6 to 259 nests); Herring Gulls (Larus argentatus; from 0 to 244 nests); and Caspian Terns (Hydroprogne caspia; from 0 to 496 nests). Cormorants are currently above (2,500 nests), while Caspian Terns (400–600 nests), Night-Herons (100–200 nests) and Herring Gulls (200–300 nests) are within population targets set out in the Hamilton Harbour Remedial Action Plan. Despite conservation efforts, Common Terns (Sterna hirundo) declined from a peak of 1,028 nests (1990) to 333 nests (2013), although currently within the population target (300–600 nests). Ring-billed Gulls (L. delawarensis), through long-term management and habitat restrictions, were reduced from a peak of 39,621 nests (1990) to 11,133 nests (2013), but still exceed the target (<10,000 nests). Changes in the amount of available habitat have affected waterbird distributions: the loss of 42 ha (peak in 1999) of former nesting areas to development has been partially offset by the creation or securement of 1.9 ha of dedicated breeding habitat. Continued management, assessed and refined annually, is required to maintain species diversity in the area. Current management techniques focus on preventing Ring-billed Gulls from nesting on private lands and dedicated Tern nesting habitat, excluding Cormorants from nesting at specific sites, and reducing inter-specific competition with Night-Herons and Herring Gulls. Recommendations and considerations regarding future management and conservation efforts to reach Remedial Action Plan targets in the harbor are outlined.