The use of washing machines was investigated in two remote Aboriginal communities in the Anangu Pitjantjatjara homelands. The aim was to look both at machine reliability and to investigate the health aspect of washing clothes. A total of 39 machines were inspected for wear and component reliability every three months over a one‐year period. Of these, 10 machines were monitored in detail for water consumption, hours of use and cycles of operation. The machines monitored were Speed Queen model EA2011 (7 kg washing load) commercial units. The field survey results suggested a high rate of operation of the machines with an average of around 1,100 washing cycles per year (range 150 and 2,300 cycles per year). The results were compared with available figures for the average Australian household. A literature survey, to ascertain the health outcomes relating to washing clothes and bedding, confirmed that washing machines are efficient at removal of bacteria from clothes and bedding but suggested that recontamination of clothing after washing often negated the prior removal. High temperature washing (>60d̀C) appeared to be advantageous from a health perspective. With regards to larger organisms, while dust mites and body lice transmission between people would probably be decreased by washing clothes, scabies appeared to be mainly transmitted by body contact and thus transmission would be only marginally decreased by the use of washing machines.

An industrial hygiene study was conducted at a primary lead smelter to determine the effective protection factors for negative pressure and powered air purifying half-mask respirators. The study involved 99 paired personal samples taken in six different work areas, in which randomly chosen subjects from the workforce wore dual sampling pumps connected to closed-face 37-mm cassettes. The cassettes were attached either to the workers' lapels for exposure measurements outside the respirator or to a ported respirator for exposure measurements inside the respirator. Samples were collected throughout the work shift and analyzed for lead according to National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Method 7082. Using particle size distribution data obtained for the same workplaces, the within-mask samples were corrected for sampling bias. The negative pressure half-mask respirators showed a mean effective protection factor of 6.5 and a mean corrected effective protection factor of 4.56, with a 5th percentile less than 0.5. Approximately 80 percent and 90 percent of the effective protection factors and the corrected effective protection factors, respectively, were equal to or less than the assigned protection factor of 10. For the powered air purifying half-mask respirators, the means for effective protection factor and corrected effective protection factor were 18.20 and 11.92, respectively, with a 5th percentile of 1.0 or less. Approximately 90 percent and 95 percent of the effective protection factors and the corrected effective protection factors, respectively, were equal to or less than the assigned protection factor of 50. The uncorrected and corrected within-mask lead concentrations for both types of respirators exceeded the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) permissible exposure limit (PEL) for lead by 19 percent to 58 percent. These results indicate that the straight application of assigned protection factors to actual workplace situations may not always be appropriate.

No abstract