Emergence from anesthesia can be associated with a wide spectrum of cognitive and behavioral dysregulation in children, including delirium or acute brain dysfunction. This period of neurobehavioral recovery can be further confounded by pain, anxiety, and fear. The implementation of monitoring for level of consciousness, pain, and delirium using valid pediatric tools is necessary to avoid misdiagnosis due to overlapping symptomatology and support appropriate management. Understanding the epidemiology of delirium in the postoperative setting will require consistent use of accurate terminology in the medical literature. The current interchangeable use of the terms “emergence agitation” and “emergence delirium” needs to be highlighted and awareness of differences in patient conditions and assessment tools is essential. We discuss epidemiology of emergence agitation and delirium in the pediatric population, and the challenges for future delineation of monitoring and management. Furthermore, we describe the possible impact of long-term consequences of emergence delirium among infants and children, and the necessary areas of future research.

Objective Newborns requiring hospitalisation frequently undergo painful procedures. Prevention of pain in infants is of prime concern because of adverse associations with physiological and neurological development. However, pain mitigation is currently guided by behavioural observation assessments that have not been validated against direct evidence of pain processing in the brain. The aim of this study was to determine whether cry presence or amplitude is a valid indicator of pain processing in newborns. Design Prospective observational cohort. Setting Newborn nursery. Patients Healthy infants born at >37 weeks and <42 weeks gestation. Interventions We prospectively studied newborn cortical responses to light touch, cold and heel stick, and the amplitude of associated infant vocalisations using our previously published paradigms of time-locked electroencephalogram (EEG) with simultaneous audio recordings. Results Latencies of cortical peak responses to each of the three stimuli type were significantly different from each other. Of 54 infants, 13 (24%), 19 (35%) and 35 (65%) had cries in response to light touch, cold and heel stick, respectively. Cry in response to non-painful stimuli did not predict cry in response to heel stick. All infants with EEG data had measurable pain responses to heel stick, whether they cried or not. There was no association between presence or amplitude of cries and cortical nociceptive amplitudes. Conclusions In newborns with distinct brain responses to light touch, cold and pain, cry presence or amplitude characteristics do not provide adequate behavioural markers of pain signalling in the brain. New bedside assessments of newborn pain may need to be developed using brain-based methodologies as benchmarks in order to provide optimal pain mitigation.

No abstract

Minimally-invasive endoscopic-assisted craniectomy (EAC) achieves similar functional and cosmetic outcomes, whereas reducing morbidity risk that is often associated with complex cranial vault reconstruction. Antifibrinolytics (AF) usage to limit blood loss and transfusion requirements during complex cranial vault reconstruction has been studied extensively; however, studies are limited for AF therapy in EAC. The aim of this single-center retrospective observational cohort pilot study was to evaluate whether the use of AF was associated with reduced blood loss in infants undergoing EAC. The authors hypothesized that there would be no difference in blood loss between patients who received AF and those that did not receive AF during EAC. Non-syndromic patients who underwent single-suture EAC were retrospectively evaluated. Primary outcome measure was intraoperative calculated blood loss (mL/ kg). Secondary outcome measures included perioperative red blood cells transfusion volumes, number of blood donor exposures, and pediatric intensive care unit and total hospital length of stay. Study cohort demographic and outcome data were analyzed; Fisher exact test was used for categorical data, Student t test was used for continuous data. A P value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Forty-nine EAC patients were included in the study with 34 patients in the AF cohort and 15 patients in the non-AF cohort. There were no significant differences in demographics between the 2 groups. Additionally, there was no significant difference in intraoperative calculated blood loss or any secondary outcome measure. In our singlesuture EAC study cohorts, AF administration was not associated with a decrease in blood loss when compared to those that did not receive AF therapy.