Background: Little is known about the scope of problems driving referrals to child and adolescent psychiatry services. Identifying the full range of mental disorders affecting a particular child can help triage the child to a clinician with the appropriate level of expertise. The Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) is an easy-to-use assessment tool that may provide invaluable information regarding the severity of the presenting complaints and also aid in the referral process. Objective: To assess the utility of the CBCL to gain insights into the type of clinical problems driving referrals of youth to an outpatient pediatric psychiatry clinic. Method: The sample consisted of 418 newly referred youth 4-18 years of age of both sexes. Parents completed the CBCL assessing psychopathology and competence. Rates of patients with elevated T-scores on each scale were calculated for the whole group and stratified by sex and age (≤12 versus >12). Results: The CBCL identified high rates of psychopathology affecting referred youth. It also provided information on the type of suspected disorders affecting a particular child as well as their severity, critical information to guide likely differing clinical needs and therapeutic approaches. It also helped identify a high number of youth affected with multiple psychopathological conditions, likely to require a high level of clinical attention. Overall, males were significantly more impaired than females but there were no major differences between children and adolescents. Conclusions: The CBCL can aid in the identification of individual and comorbid mental disorders affecting youth seeking mental health services by providing specific information about the presence and the severity of specific suspected disorder. These findings have implications for prioritizing scarce resources in child mental health and for improved consideration of the complexity of clinical presentations to pediatric psychiatry programs of any type.

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the morbidity of subthreshold pediatric bipolar (BP) disorder. Methods:We performed a systematic literature search in November 2017 and included studies examining the morbidity of pediatric subthreshold BP. Extracted outcomes included functional impairment, severity of mood symptoms, psychiatric comorbidities, suicidal ideation and behaviors, and mental health treatment. We used meta-analysis to compute the pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) for continuous measures and the pooled risk ratio (RR) for binary measures between two paired groups: subthreshold pediatric BP vs controls and subthreshold pediatric BP vs pediatric BP-I. Results: Eleven papers, consisting of seven datasets, were included. We compared subthreshold pediatric BP (N = 244) to non-BP controls (N = 1125) and subthreshold pediatric BP (N = 643) to pediatric BP-I (N = 942). Subthreshold pediatric BP was associated with greater functional impairment (SMD = 0.61, CI 0.25-0.97), greater severity of mood symptomatology (mania: SMD = 1.88, CI 1.38-2.38; depression: SMD = 0.66, CI 0.52-0.80), higher rates of disruptive behavior (RR = 1.75, CI 1.17-2.62), mood (RR = 1.78, CI 1.29-2.79) and substance use (RR = 2.27, CI 1.23-4.21)disorders, and higher rates of suicidal ideation and attempts (RR = 7.66, CI 1.71-34.33) compared to controls. Pediatric BP-I was associated with greater functional impairment, greater severity of manic symptoms, higher rates of suicidal ideation and attempts, and higher rates of mental health treatment compared to subthreshold pediatric BP. There were no differences between full and subthreshold cases in the severity of depressive symptoms or rates of comorbid disorders.Conclusions: Subthreshold pediatric BP disorder is an identifiable morbid condition associated with significant functional impairment including psychiatric comorbidities and high rates of suicidality. K E Y W O R D Sbipolar disorder, child, pediatric, subthreshold | INTRODUC TI ONAs pediatric bipolar (BP) disorder tends to evolve over time, some youth may present to clinical attention with insufficient symptoms to fulfill full diagnostic criteria for a diagnosis of BP disorder.However, while much is known about full threshold pediatric BP disorder, little is known about subthreshold forms of pediatric BP disorder.

Objectives To examine the validity of subthreshold pediatric bipolar-I (BP-I) disorder, we compared the familial risk for BP-I disorder in child probands with full BP-I disorder, subthreshold BP-I disorder, ADHD, and non-ADHD/non-bipolar disorder controls. Methods Probands were youth ages 6–17 meeting criteria for BP-I disorder, full (N=239) or subthreshold (N=43), and their first degree relatives (N=687 and N=120, respectively). Comparators were youth with ADHD (N=162), controls (N=136), and their first-degree relatives (N=511 and N=411, respectively). We randomly selected 162 non-bipolar ADHD probands and 136 non-bipolar non-ADHD control probands of similar age and sex distribution to the BP-I probands from our case-control ADHD family studies. Psychiatric assessments were made by trained psychometricians using the KSADS-E and SCID structured diagnostic interviews. We analyzed rates of bipolar disorder using multinomial logistic regression. Results Rates of full bipolar-I disorder significantly differed between the four groups (χ23 = 32.72, p<0.001): relatives of full BP-I and relatives of subthreshold BP-I probands had significantly higher rates of full BP-I disorder than relatives of ADHD probands and relatives of control probands. Relatives of full BP-I, subthreshold BP-I, and ADHD probands also had significantly higher rates of major depressive disorder (MDD) compared to relatives of control probands. Conclusions Our results showed that youth with subthreshold BP-I disorder had similarly elevated risk for BP-I disorder and MDD in first-degree relatives as youth with full BP-I disorder. These findings support the diagnostic continuity between subsyndromal and fully syndromatic states of pediatric BP-I disorder.