The high mortality rate for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) relative to its prevalence underscores the need for curative-intent therapies. Multidisciplinary treatment decisions are required to craft optimal treatment strategies considering tumor size, location and underlying liver cirrhosis. Surgical resection of anatomically limited tumors with adequate hepatic reserve provides long-term survival in more than half of patients and remains a standard first-line therapy. Eligibility for resection among newly diagnosed patients is low and recurrences in the remaining cirrhotic liver are common. Transplantation offers a higher chance of cure. Long wait times for the limited door pool require neoadjuvant loco-regional therapies to maintain transplant eligibility. Image-guided therapies such as ablation and embolization have an established role as primary or neoadjuvant preparing patients for curative treatment. Percutaneous ablation in appropriately selected patients offers long-term survival similar to resection. New and evolving techniques such as stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), radiation segmentectomy and lobectomy, and combination therapies employing both trans-arterial and ablative approaches show promise for curative-intent treatment but require further prospective data before they can be integrated into treatment algorithms. For palliativeintent therapy, conventional trans-arterial chemoembolization with lipiodol-based emulsions remains the only technique supported by clinical trials. Newer platforms such as drug-eluting embolics failed to improve survival over bland embolization in randomized trials and showed increased hepatobiliary toxicity. Transarterial radioembolization offers similar overall survival (OS) to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and non-inferiority to sorafenib in meta-analyses. The more favorable clinical toxicity profile makes it an appealing technique for patients willing to accept the longer time to response.

In modern clinical decision-support algorithms, heterogeneity in image characteristics due to variations in imaging systems and protocols hinders the development of reproducible quantitative measures including for feature extraction pipelines. With the help of a reader study, we investigate the ability to provide consistent ground-truth targets by using patient-specific 3D-printed lung phantoms. PixelPrint was developed for 3D-printing lifelike computed tomography (CT) lung phantoms by directly translating clinical images into printer instructions that control density on a voxel-by-voxel basis. Datasets of three COVID-19 patients served as input for 3D-printing lung phantoms. Five radiologists rated patient and phantom images for imaging characteristics and diagnostic confidence in a blinded reader study. Effect sizes of evaluating phantom as opposed to patient images were assessed using linear mixed models. Finally, PixelPrint’s production reproducibility was evaluated. Images of patients and phantoms had little variation in the estimated mean (0.03-0.29, using a 1-5 scale). When comparing phantom images to patient images, effect size analysis revealed that the difference was within one-third of the inter- and intra-reader variabilities. High correspondence between the four phantoms created using the same patient images was demonstrated by PixelPrint's production repeatability tests, with greater similarity scores between high-dose acquisitions of the phantoms than between clinical-dose acquisitions of a single phantom. We demonstrated PixelPrint’s ability to produce lifelike CT lung phantoms reliably. These phantoms have the potential to provide ground-truth targets for validating the generalizability of inference-based decision-support algorithms between different health centers and imaging protocols and for optimizing examination protocols with realistic patient-based phantoms.

No abstract

Metastatic liver disease is one of the major causes of cancer-related morbidity and mortality. Locoregional therapies offered by interventional oncologists alleviate cancer-related morbidity and in some cases improve survival. Locoregional therapies are often palliative in nature but occasionally can be used with curative intent. This review will discuss important factors to consider prior to palliative and curative intent treatment of metastatic liver disease with locoregional therapy. These factors include those specific to the tumor, liver function, liver reserve, differences between treatment modalities, and patient-specific considerations.

No abstract