Introduction:Despite increased research on opioids in the orthopaedic literature, little is known of the prescribing practices of orthopaedic providers based on their level of training. The purpose of this study was to describe the discharge opioid prescribing patterns of orthopaedic providers, stratifying by level of training and orthopaedic subspecialty, within a single medical system.Methods:A retrospective review of orthopaedic surgical encounters was performed over a 1-year period for adults who received a discharge opioid prescription. Patient demographics and prescriber characteristics were collected, including the provider's level of training (attending, fellow, resident, physician assistant [PA], and nurse practitioner [NP]) and surgical subspecialty. Junior residents were postgraduate year 1 to 3, whereas senior residents/fellows were postgraduate year 4 to 6. Discharge opioids were converted to milligram morphine equivalents (MMEs). Overprescribing was defined as a prescribing more than a seven-day supply or >45 MMEs per day. Multivariable linear regression analysis determined the factors associated with discharge MMEs, whereas logistic regression determined the factors associated with overprescribing opioids.Results:Of the 3,786 patients reviewed, 1,500 met the criteria for inclusion in the study. The greatest proportion of opioid prescriptions was written by junior residents (33.9%), followed by NPs (30.1%), PAs (24.1%), senior residents/fellows (10.6%), and attendings (1.2%). Compared with junior residents, senior residents prescribed −59.4 MMEs, NPs prescribed +104 MMEs, and attendings prescribed +168 MMEs (P < 0.05), whereas PAs prescribed similar amounts (P > 0.05). Orthopaedic subspecialty was also predictive of discharge MMEs (P < 0.05). Senior residents and attendings were more likely to prescribe more than seven days of opioids (P < 0.05), whereas NPs and PAs were more likely to prescribe >45 MMEs per day (P < 0.05).Discussion:This study demonstrates significant variability in opioid prescribing practices according to provider level of training and subspecialty. National guidelines for opioid prescribing practices and educational programs may help reduce such variability.Level of Evidence:Level III, retrospective cohort study

The interface of religion, spirituality, and psychiatric practice has long been of interest to the ethical psychiatrist. Some prominent early psychotherapists had a strained relationship with religion and spirituality. They posited that religion and spirituality were forms of mental illness, which discouraged the discussion of these values during treatment despite the fact that many patients subscribed to a religious or spiritual viewpoint. Contrarily, others supported a harmonious relationship with religion and spirituality and served as trailblazers for the incorporation of religion and spirituality into psychiatric treatment.As the field of psychiatry continues to evolve, additional dimensions of the relationship between religion, spirituality, and psychiatric practice must be explored. Today, many modern psychiatrists appreciate the importance of incorporating religion and spirituality into treatment, but questions such as whether it is ethical to practice psychiatry from a particular religious or spiritual viewpoint or for psychiatrists to advertise that they subscribe to a particular religion or spirituality and to engage in religious or spiritual practices with their patients remain nuanced and complex. In this resource document, the authors put forth and examine the ramifications of a bio-psycho-social-religious/spiritual model for psychological development and functioning, with this fourth dimension shifting the focus from symptom reduction alone to include other aspects of human flourishing such as resilience, meaning-making, and hope.

Background: In the lower extremity, studies have suggested an optimal nail diameter to medullary canal diameter (ND/MCD) ratio to minimize postoperative complications. The goal of this study was to determine whether a correlation exists between the occurrence of complications, angulation, and range of motion and the ratio of the ND/MCD in the upper extremity. Methods: A total of 85 radius and ulna fractures treated with flexible intramedullary nails had ND/MCD ratios measured. Random-effects models were developed to determine the association between complications and ND/MCD ratio, angulation and ND/MCD ratio, and range of motion and ND/MCD ratio. The results were reported for unadjusted models and adjusted models. Results: Of the 85 forearm fractures treated with intramedullary nailing, there were 3 complications. The average follow-up was 6 months. The ND/MCD ratios were categorized as <0.50, 0.50 to 0.59, and ≥0.60. There was not a significant association between the different ratios and angulation, or risk of complication. There was an association between the ND/MCD ratio ≥0.60 and decreased pronation of −1.58° (−2.77° to −0.38°) and supination of −2.68° (−4.91° to −0.46°) ( P < .05). Conclusion: This study found that there was not an association between the nail to canal diameter ratio and postoperative angulation in forearm fractures treated with flexible intramedullary nails. When choosing a flexible nail for forearm fractures, there does not appear to be an optimal ratio; it is therefore reasonable to use the ND that passes more easily.

No abstract

Background: Extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU) tendinopathy is characterized by pain along the dorsal and ulnar aspect of the wrist and distal forearm. It is common in athletes who play stick and racquet sports due to repetitive motion and axial-loading through the wrist and forearm. Conservative therapeutic options include rest, the use of anti-inflammatory medications, and various injections. Rehabilitation via occupational or physical therapy includes therapeutic exercise, splinting, activity modification, manual therapy, and modalities. Methods: A narrative review of the literature on ECU tendinopathy is presented, and a case study approach is used to highlight the clinical management of this condition in an elite athlete. Results: An approach of medical management and rehabilitation allowed this patient to successfully return to play. Conclusions: A combination of conservative measures and rehabilitation can be used to treat ECU tendinopathy and permit patients to be symptom-free and return to their desired activities.