No abstract

This analysis of the non-clinical NSAID literature demonstrated a possible association between exposure to NSAIDs and developmental anomalies. The anomalies were similar for aspirin and for other NSAIDs, but effects occurred at a much lower incidence with non-aspirin NSAIDs than previously reported with aspirin. Such a finding is consistent with the concept that reversible inhibition of COX-1 and/or COX-2 by other NSAIDs would produce weaker developmental toxicity signals than aspirin. However, there were limitations of the evaluated studies: (1) there were very few robust International Conference on Harmonization-compliant studies conducted with NSAIDs in the published literature; (2) many of the studies were conducted at doses well below the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), where effects are rarely seen; and (3) numerous studies were conducted above the MTD, where reduced numbers of fetuses hampered detection of low-incidence findings. Although weak associations were observed, these limitations prevented us from definitively determining the presence or absence of a developmental toxicity signal from the existing body of NSAID data. Further exploration of this hypothesis will require assessing the potential association in animal models by using dose levels centered around the MTD.

No abstract

Background Assessing risks to human development from chemical exposure typically requires integrating findings from laboratory animal and human studies. Methods Using a case study approach, we present a program designed to assess the risk of the occurrence of malformations from inorganic arsenic exposure. We discuss how epidemiological data should be evaluated for quality and criteria for determining whether an association is causal. In this case study, adequate epidemiological data were not available for evaluating the potential effect of arsenic on development. Consequently, results from appropriately designed, conducted, and interpreted developmental toxicity studies, which have been shown to be predictive of human risk under numerous scenarios, were used. In our case study, the existing animal data were not designed appropriately to assess risk from environmental exposures, although such studies may be useful for hazard identification. Because the human and animal databases were deficient, a research program comprising modern guideline toxicological studies was designed and conducted. Results The results of those studies in rats, mice, and rabbits indicate that oral and inhalational exposures to inorganic arsenic do not cause structural malformations, and inhalational exposures produced no developmental effects at all. The new study results are discussed in conjunction with considerations of metabolism, toxicokinetics, and maternal toxicity. Conclusions Based on the available experimental data, and absent contrary findings from adequately conducted epidemiological studies, we conclude that exposure to inorganic arsenic by environmentally relevant routes poses no risk of the occurrence of malformations and little risk of other prenatal developmental toxicity in developing humans without concomitant and near‐lethal toxicological effects in mothers. Teratology 62:51–71, 2000. © 2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

No abstract