BackgroundSlow decline in the incidence of tuberculosis (TB) has been observed in most high TB burden countries. Knowledge of the prevalence of different TB risk factors can help expand TB control strategies. However with the exception of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) the prevalence of the other TB risk factors are poorly studied in Uganda. We aimed to determine the prevalence of different TB risk factors and TB disease presentation among TB patients in Kampala Uganda.MethodsWe assessed 365 adult TB patients and used descriptive statistics to summarize their socio-demographic, clinical, radiological, sputum mycobacteriology and TB risk factors (HIV, diabetes, TB contact, alcohol use, tobacco smoking, poverty and overcrowding) data.ResultsA total of 158 (43.3%) patients were male and the median age was 29 (IQR 28–30). Majority of the patients (89.2%) had pulmonary TB, 86.9% were new and 13.2% were retreatment. Wasting (i.e. body mass index of <18.5 kg/m2) was found in 38.5% of the patients and 63% presented with cough. Constitutional symptoms (fever, anorexia, night sweats and weight loss) were reported by 32.1%. Most patients (78.6%) presented with non-cavity lung parenchyma disease (infiltrates, nodules, masses) but 35.2% had cavity disease. Pleural disease was detected in 19.3% of patients. Positive smear microscopy and culture (irrespective of month of treatment) was found in 52.7% and 36.5% of patients respectively. Any drug resistance was detected in 21.1% of patients while multidrug resistance (MDR) TB defined as resistance to rifampicin and isoniazid was detected in 6.3% of patients. All MDR patients were new patients.The prevalence of TB risk factors were as follows: HIV 41.4%, diabetes 5.4%, close contact 11.5%, family history 17.5%, smoking 26.37%, poverty 39.5%, overcrowding 57.3% and alcohol use 50.7%. Overcrowding increased smear positive rate, prevalence ratio 1.22, p = 0.09 but all the other studied risk factors did not affect clinical, radiological and mycobacteriological study patient characteristics.ConclusionsAmong TB patients in Kampala, Uganda, there is high prevalence of the known TB risk factors. Targeting reducing their prevalence may lead to better TB control in the country. Tuberculosis, risk factors, Uganda.

No abstract

Background: Patient satisfaction towards care during encounter with clinicians is key for better treatment outcomes. We assessed patient satisfaction with TB clinical care consultations in Kampala, Uganda. Methods: This was a facility-based cross sectional study done between September 2012 and February 2013 using qualitative method of data collection. Participants consecutively completed a pre-tested structured satisfaction questionnaire. A criteria of the rating as good; >75% was considered acceptable, (50-75%) as more effort is needed and <50 as unacceptable and require immediate action was used to categorize data for analysis using Epi-info 7.1.4.0. Results: Of the 260 registered TB patients, 178(68.5%) completed the questionnaire. Overall, 162 (91.0%) were satisfied with the clinical consultation. Factors that contributed to high patient satisfaction, were: time spent with clinician (85.4%), explanation of what was done (87.6%), technical skills (91.6%), personal manner of the clinician seen (91.6%). Factors for low satisfaction were; waiting time before getting an appointment (61.8%), convenience of location of consultation office (53.4%), getting through to the office by phone (21.3%) and length of time waiting at the office (61.2%). Conclusion: Tuberculosis patients in Kampala are satisfied with TB clinical care consultations. Addressing factors with low patient satisfaction may significantly impact on treatment outcome.

No abstract

e19009 Background: Breast cancer, the most common cancer in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), is characterized by poor survival. An accurate assessment of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor 2 receptor (HER2) status, typically via immunohistochemistry (IHC), is considered essential to provide prognostic data and guide therapeutic decision-making. However, due to inaccessible IHC services, these data are often unavailable in many parts of SSA; alternate methods need to be explored. Given the lab infrastructure developed in response to the HIV pandemic, RT-PCR testing is more readily accessible and feasible in SSA. Here we assess the potential of RT-PCR in evaluating the receptor status of women with breast cancer in Uganda. Methods: We enrolled women with a new diagnosis of invasive breast cancer at the Uganda Cancer Institute. Demographic and clinical data were obtained. A formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) specimen was utilized for quantitative RT-PCR, using a validated assay for the detection of the ER, PR and HER2. Receptor expression levels were expressed as relative quantity (RQ) compared to housekeeping genes (CALM2). HER2 IHC results were categorized as negative (score 0 or 1+) or positive (3+); 2+ results (n=6) were excluded as FISH testing was not performed. Unstained slides were sent to the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center for IHC. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was applied to compare RT-PCR to IHC (gold standard). Results: We analyzed interim data (anticipated N=100 of an ongoing study) from 32 women aged 35 to 56 years. The majority of women (25, 78%) presented with advanced stage disease. Of the 32 cancers, 18 were ER+ (56%), 10 were PR+ (31%), 9 were HER2+ (28%) and 8 were triple negative (25%) by IHC. From ROC analysis, the AUC were 0.94, 0.95, and 0.81 for ER, PR, and HER2 respectively with high sensitivity and specificity (Table). Conclusions: Despite the tremendous need, the ability to detect the ER, PR, and HER2 via IHC in SSA is limited. Here we demonstrate the favorable test characteristics of RT-PCR when compared to IHC. Given the relatively wide accessibility of RT-PCR and endocrine therapy for breast cancer, as well as the recent inclusion of trastuzumab in the WHO’s Essential Medicines List, the results of this study have both direct diagnostic and therapeutic implications. Clinical trial information: NCT03518242 . [Table: see text]