Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a dominant and highly penetrant monogenic disorder present from birth that markedly elevates plasma low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol concentration and, if untreated, leads to premature atherosclerosis and coronary artery disease (CAD). There are approximately 100,000 people with FH in Australia. However, an overwhelming majority of those affected remain undetected and inadequately treated, consistent with FH being a leading challenge for public health genomics. To further address the unmet need, we provide an updated guidance, presented as a series of systematically collated recommendations, on the care of patients and families with FH. These recommendations have been informed by an exponential growth in published works and new evidence over the last 5 years and are compatible with a contemporary global call to action on FH. Recommendations are given on the detection, diagnosis, assessment and management of FH in adults and children. Recommendations are also made on genetic testing and risk notification of biological relatives who should undergo cascade testing for FH. Guidance on management is based on the concepts of risk re-stratification, adherence to heart healthy lifestyles, treatment of non-cholesterol risk factors, and safe and appropriate use of LDL-cholesterol lowering therapies, including statins, ezetimibe, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors and lipoprotein apheresis. Broad recommendations are also provided for the organisation and development of health care services. Recommendations on best practice need to be underpinned by good clinical judgment and shared decision making with patients and families. Models of care for FH need to be adapted to local and regional health care needs and available resources. A comprehensive and realistic implementation strategy, informed by further research, including assessments of cost-benefit, will be required to ensure that this new guidance benefits all Australian families with or at risk of FH.

nation product rescheduling, and dispensed tablets increased by 1.2%. Linear regression analysis indicates that the reductions in dispensed hydrocodone combination product prescriptions and tablets were substantially greater than would have been predicted in the absence of rescheduling. Compared with predicted values for hydrocodone combination product and nonhydrocodone combination product opioid analgesics, there was an overall reduction of 14 360 378 (95% CI, 14 037 780-14 682 876) opioid prescriptions and 750 095 774 (95% CI, 733 245 286-766 946 262) opioid tablets dispensed in the 12 months after rescheduling. Reduced prescribing of hydrocodone combination products was seen for most health care professional specialties after rescheduling (Table). Primary care physicians and surgeons accounted for the largest absolute reductions in dispensed hydrocodone combination product prescriptions and tablets. Pain medicine physicians had modest increases in both dispensed hydrocodone combination product prescriptions and tablets.

With the surge of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies making almost all genetic tests more affordable and available, cardiac genetic testing now routinely encompasses a large number of genes within a panel setting. The additional sensitivity of this practice is limited and has the potential to inflict a spectrum of uncertainty. We sought to explore attitudes, preferences, recall and psychological consequences of informative and uninformative genetic results amongst probands diagnosed with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). We conducted semi-structured interviews and analysed the qualitative data using a framework analysis process. In general, we found probands were more concerned with their clinical diagnosis than gene result and in some, recall and understanding of genetic diagnosis was poor. Several participants expected genetic testing would alleviate uncertainty, often holding an altruistic view of participation in testing, removing their sense of self and failing to appreciate fully the familial implications. With the key utility of HCM genetic testing and counselling being for greater risk prediction for at-risk relatives, effective communication within the family is critical. While communication appeared adequate, further questioning found it was often vague, failing to translate into meaningful action by relatives. Based on these findings, a framework of key outcomes to assist multidisciplinary teams in genetic counselling of probands receiving an HCM gene result was developed.