Background: Despite their poor prognosis, patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have little access to palliative care and tend to have a high rate of hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) admissions during their last year of life. Objectives: To determine the feasibility of a home palliative care intervention during 1 year versus usual care, and the possible impact of this intervention on emergency, hospital and ICU admissions, survival, mood, and health-related quality of life (HRQL). Methods: Prospective controlled study of patients with severe COPD (GOLD stage III or IV) and long-term oxygen therapy and/or home noninvasive ventilation and/or one or more hospital admissions in the previous year for acute exacerbation, randomized to usual care versus usual care with add-on monthly intervention by palliative care specialists at home for 12 months. Results: Of 315 patients screened, 49 (15.5%) were randomized (26 to early palliative care; 23 to the control group); aged (mean ± SD) 71 ± 8 years; FEV1 was 37 ± 14% predicted; 88% with a COPD assessment test score > 10; 69% on long-term oxygen therapy or home noninvasive ventilation. The patients accepted the intervention and completed the assessment scales. After 1 year, there was no difference between groups in symptoms, HRQL and mood, and there was a nonsignificant trend for higher admission rates to hospital and emergency wards in the intervention group. Conclusion: Although this pilot study was underpowered to formally exclude a benefit from palliative care in severe COPD, it raises several questions as to patient selection, reluctance to palliative care in this group, and modalities of future trials.
Although both group reviews and individual reviews of videotaped standardized patient encounters were received well by the students, there were several statistical differences in favor of the individual format.
Neurological complications are a relevant cause of morbidity and mortality after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT). We retrospectively analysed neurological complications of 165 paediatric patients who underwent SCT between 1996 and 2003. In all, 111 (67%) transplantations were allogeneic and 54 (33%) transplantations were autologous. Post-SCT neurological complications were seen in 24% of patients. They were seen in six children after autologous SCT and in 11 and 23 cases after allogeneic-related and -unrelated SCT. Neurological symptoms occurred between day þ 22 and þ 912 after transplantation and were classified into two groups. The first group (n ¼ 21) offered non-repetitive symptoms lasting less than 24 h without any cerebral imaging and cerebrospinal fluid(CSF) abnormalities. The second group (n ¼ 19) was characterized by progressive neurological symptoms, pathological MRI findings and/or abnormal results in CSF. Those with a progressive clinical course resulted from infections (n ¼ 10), drug toxicity (n ¼ 5), cerebrovascular events (n ¼ 2) and the central nervous system (CNS) relapse of the underlying disease (n ¼ 2). In particular, cerebral aspergillosis and toxoplasmosis after allogeneic unrelated SCT are a major challenge and are associated with a high mortality. In conclusion, our data suggest that patients presenting with progressive neurological symptoms after SCT require prompt diagnostic procedures and initiation in antimicrobial therapy in case of any findings suggestive of CNS infection.
These interns, mostly U.S. medical school graduates (98.7%, n = 155) reported little training and low self-perceived comfort and skill with important elements of end-of-life communication that might contribute to a lack of preparedness to address these issues during their internship. Further research that confirms and explains the underlying reasons for these findings seems warranted.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.