Sewer asset management gained momentum and importance in recent years due to economic considerations, since infrastructure maintenance and rehabilitation directly represent major investments. Because physical urban water infrastructure has life expectancies of up to 100 years or more, contemporary urban drainage systems are strongly influenced by historical decisions and implementations. The current decisions taken in sewer asset management will, therefore, have a long-lasting impact on the functionality and quality of future services provided by these networks. These decisions can be supported by different approaches ranging from various inspection techniques, deterioration models to assess the probability of failure or the technical service life, to sophisticated decision support systems crossing boundaries to other urban infrastructure. This paper presents the state of the art in sewer asset management in its manifold facets spanning a wide field of research and highlights existing research gaps while giving an outlook on future developments and research areas.

Sustainable water management is a worldwide challenge for the twenty-first century. It involves replacing traditional management approaches with a new concept, often referred to as sustainable urban water management (SUWM). This paradigm shift means that SUWM systems must include new services, some of which have already emerged. However, no publications have presented the expected SUWM system in terms of the full range of services it would need to include, and no publications have proposed a method for identifying the services the system must provide. This paper proposes a method for identifying these services and presents a generic petal diagram to represent the service functions of the SUWM system. Moreover, this paper presents a new method for defining these services in a specific territory. This method is based on the confrontation between a general representation and the objectives of the stakeholders in a given system in a given territory. The method is illustrated with a full-scale case study on the Doua eco-campus (Lyon University). This method is intended to aid practitioners to manage its system and to transition to SUWM. It is designed to improve the transparency of decision formulation and to involve stakeholders in the process.

No abstract

Water utilities ensure the delivery of water to consumers through a pressured network composed of several hydraulic components: reservoirs, pipes, valves, and pumps. A right maintenance policy that takes into consideration both technical and economic factors must be applied to enhance the hydraulic performance and reliability of the water network. With the help of a multiobjective approach based on a Pareto ranking and a modified genetic algorithm, we propose a decision support model that ensures the scheduling of pipe renewal according to available financial resources. The model is based on forecasting pipe failures and evaluating future maintenance costs. Two indexes are used to measure the hydraulic deficiency in the water network after a failure occurrence. They measure the undelivered water quantity and the number of unsupplied nodes when a considered pipe is unavailable during the peak demand period. Both indices permit classification of pipes and help identify critical ones. Feasible solutions are assessed according to economic and technical objectives. The model proposes solutions that enhance the reliability of a water distribution network and reduce failure occurrences, thus giving better satisfaction to consumers.

Asset management is an increasing concern for the water and wastewater industry. Condition assessment of sewer segments is an important component of sewer asset management and relies mostly on visual inspection. Observed defects are translated into a score for each segment. Although most protocols give a segment a condition grade by comparing its score with a subjective scale of numerical values, we propose a protocol to calibrate thresholds for each asset stock. Thresholds are calculated according to two sets of parameters: overall condition of the asset stock in question (estimated by a representative sample or provided by the utility manager) and assignment-error weighting (determined by the utility manager) linked to either over-estimation or under-estimation of condition grade. This method is applied to 150 km of sewers from the Greater Lyon asset stock. Sensitivity analyses of these parameters are then implemented. Three hypotheses about overall condition of the asset stock are combined with three matrices of assignment-error weights. Both parameters influence thresholds and change the assessment of the studied segments. The synthesis of such sensitivity analyses can be used to prioritise complementary investigations.