Breast implant surgery for cosmetic or reconstructive purposes is becoming increasingly common. While the devices used are regulated and approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, all patients with breast implants require continued follow-up. Many patients will seek this care from their primary care providers, especially when follow-up with their plastic surgeon is difficult. It is vital that treating clinicians are knowledgeable about the history of breast implants, routine screening guidelines, and the recent breast implant "hot topics"-breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL), connective tissue disease, and breast implant illness. This paper will provide the necessary information for primary care providers to appropriately counsel patients with breast implants to maintain not only their trust, but also their health. Abbreviations BIA-ALCLBreast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma FDA US Food and Drug Administration MRI Magnetic resonance imaging TNM Tumor, node, metastasis

Supplement, 100th Annual Meeting Display EPosters necrosis, flap failure, implant failure/removal, other flap/ implant complications, and other complications. Multivariable regression models adjusted for age, residence, insurance, race, and Charlson comorbidity score. 2015-2019 CPM trends were also assessed. Of 9,319 women, 7,114 (76.3%) underwent BM-TP and 2,205 (23.7%) underwent BM-P. In multivariable analysis, BM-TP had higher odds of overall complications (aOR 1.35; p=<.0001), but no difference was observed among patients who had autologous (p=0.1448) or no breast reconstruction (p=0.1530). Higher odds of overall complications persisted even after controlling for radiation therapy (aOR 1.25; p=0.0048) and chemotherapy (aOR 1.28; p=0.0047), but not after controlling for lymph node surgery (LNS) (p=0.7765). CPM rates rose significantly from 2015 to 2019, with substantial variability between age groups. Younger UBC patients consistently had higher rates of CPM. RESULTS:CONCLUSION: BM-TP (vs. BM-P) patients face higher odds of overall complications without any difference in certain reconstructive modalities or after controlling for LNS. The historic trend of increasing CPM rates is continuing, particularly among younger patients.

Each year, hundreds of thousands of women undergo aesthetic or reconstructive breast implant surgery. Clinicians and patients must be aware of the benefits and risks of this surgery. Recently, the FDA suggested a recall of certain textured breast implants because of a link between these implants and a rare form of lymphoma, now referred to as breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL). This malignancy has an indolent course and an excellent prognosis when detected and treated early. This article reviews BIA-ALCL, addresses public safety advisories, and emphasizes protocol that all clinicians should follow when encountering a patient with textured breast implants.

Background: The association between textured implants and breast implant–associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is well established, but the risk of BIA-ALCL in patients with transient exposure to a textured tissue expander (TE) is not as well documented. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence and risk of BIA-ALCL in patients with temporary exposure to a textured TE with subsequent smooth implant placement. Methods: This single-institution retrospective cohort study included all female patients who underwent two-stage breast reconstruction with placement of a textured TE from 1995 to 2016 with subsequent exchange to a smooth permanent implant. Primary outcome of interest was development of BIA-ALCL. Patients with exposure to textured implants were excluded. Follow-up was determined by last documented visit. The authors calculated summary statistics for exposure time and follow-up intervals. Results: Overall, 3310 patients had temporary exposure to a textured TE with exchange to a smooth implant, totaling 5201 textured TEs. Average textured TE exposure time was 6.7 months (median, 5.8 months). Average follow-up was 6.8 years (median, 6.3 years), ranging from 3.7 months to 18 years. No cases of BIA-ALCL were identified. Conclusions: As no cases of BIA-ALCL were identified, the risk of BIA-ALCL with short exposure to textured TEs is likely lower than the risk from exposure to permanent textured implants. Although longer follow-up is needed, these results can help counsel patients with previous exposure to textured TEs who are concerned about their risk of BIA-ALCL and can contribute to discussions on potential continued utility of textured TEs. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, IV.

Background: Prepectoral tissue expander (TE) placement for two-stage postmastectomy reconstruction is usually performed in conjunction with insertion of acellular dermal matrix (ADM). However, the effects of ADM use on TE loss or other early complications remain unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare early postoperative complications in patients who underwent prepectoral breast implant reconstruction with or without ADM use. Methods: The authors performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients at their institution who underwent prepectoral breast reconstruction from January of 2018 to June of 2021. The primary outcome was TE loss within 90 days of surgery; secondary outcomes included other complications such as infection, TE exposure, mastectomy skin flap necrosis requiring revision, and seroma. Results: Data on 714 patients with 1225 TEs (1060 with ADM and 165 without) were analyzed. Baseline demographics did not differ by ADM use, although mastectomy breast tissue weight was higher in patients without ADM (750.3 g versus 540.8 g; P < 0.001). Rates of TE loss were similar in reconstructions with (3.8%) ADM and without (6.7%; P = 0.09). We also did not find differences in the rates of secondary outcomes between cohorts. Conclusions: ADM use had no statistically significant effect on early complication rates among patients undergoing breast reconstruction with prepectoral TEs. Still, this study was underpowered, and data trended toward statistical significance; thus, larger studies are required in the future. Additional research and randomized studies should focus on larger cohorts and examine long-term complications such as capsular contracture and implant malposition. (Plast.