Ann Intern Med 2000;132:697–704 Data from the National Health Interview Survey were used to assess rates of Pap smear screening among normal and overweight/obese women. Overall screening rates, defined as a self‐report of any Pap within 3 years, were 83% for normal‐weight women; 77% to 80% for obese women, depending upon age and race. These rates were significantly lower for overweight/obese women compared to normal‐weight women. Obesity was linked to age, race, a lack of private health insurance, lower socioeconomic status, greater co‐morbidity, and a lower likelihood of getting care from a gynecologist. However, the effect of obesity on screening persisted after adjusting for these other factors. Comment: The results suggest that clinicians must be diligent in performing Pap smears in overweight/obese women. The study was limited by its use of unconfirmed self‐reported data, which may have artificially increased rates. (LSM)

PURPOSE: Psychiatric disorders and abnormal personality traits are commonly identified in patients complaining of fatigue, most of whom can be diagnosed to have depressive (D), anxiety (A), somatoform (S) or eating (E) disorders. This study was designed to determine the relationship between the prevalence of severe fatigue and the presence of personality pathology in individuals with these psychiatric disorders. METHODS: We analyzed 1197 referrals to an academic psychosomatic medicine outpatient unit. All patients underwent highly structured standardized psychometric and clinical assessments which allowed the categorical classification into D, A, S, and E groups. Within each group, the self-scored severity of fatigue experienced during the week preceding the evaluation was compared for patients with and without personality disorders (P). RESULTS: The one-week prevalence of severe fatigue was 38% in D (N ϭ 324) and 45% in D ϩ P (N ϭ 139), p ϭ NS; 29% in A (N ϭ 216) and 29% in A ϩ P (N ϭ 79), p ϭ NS; 33% in E (N ϭ 99) and 32% in E ϩ P (N ϭ 53), p ϭ NS; and 20% in S (N ϭ 209) and 34% in S ϩ P (N ϭ 78), p Ͻ .01. The difference in fatigue severity was ϩ 5% for D ϩ P vs D (p ϭ NS), ϩ 1% for A ϩ P vs A (p ϭ NS), Ϫ 2% for E ϩ P vs E (p ϭ NS) and 32% for S ϩ P vs S (p Ͻ .01). The greater severity of fatigue had a significant contribution to the difference in the 14-item index of somatic distress only for S vs S ϩ P (p ϭ .03) CONCLUSION: Severe fatigue may be a marker of personality pathology in patients with unexplained somatic complaints who do not suffer from depressive, anxiety or eating disorders. SOMATIC DISTRESS OF THE MENTALLY ILL AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO PERSONALITY DISORDERS.N Schmitz, N Hartkamp, W Tress, M Franz, P Manu, Department of Psychosomatics and Psychoterapy, Heinrich-Heine-University, Duesseldorf, Germany; Department of Medicine and Department of Psychiatry, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Glen Oaks, NY PURPOSE: Personality disorders are often invoked by clinicians as a contributing factor to the severity of physical complaints of psychiatric patiens, but the scientific support for this asociation is scant. This study was designed to determine the relationship between somatic distress and the presence of personality pathology in individuals with well-defined psychiatric disorders. METHODS: We analyzed 1437 consective referrals to an academic psychosomatic outpatient unit. Standardized psychometric and clinical evaluations were used to diagnose personality (P), depressive (D), anxiety (A), and somatoform (S) disorders. The assessment of somatic distress was based on the self-rating of the severity of 14 somatic experiences (SE) during the week preceding the evaluation. RESULTS: Compared with D (N ϭ 324), A (N ϭ 216) and S (N ϭ 209), patients with P (N ϭ 392) indicated the lowest severity of somatic distress (p ϭ .001). Patients with the comorbid associations D ϩ P (N ϭ 139) and A ϩ P (N ϭ 79) had experienced milder somatic distress than those with D or A alone (p ϭ .007). In contrast, patients with S...

PURPOSE: Psychiatric disorders and abnormal personality traits are commonly identified in patients complaining of fatigue, most of whom can be diagnosed to have depressive (D), anxiety (A), somatoform (S) or eating (E) disorders. This study was designed to determine the relationship between the prevalence of severe fatigue and the presence of personality pathology in individuals with these psychiatric disorders. METHODS: We analyzed 1197 referrals to an academic psychosomatic medicine outpatient unit. All patients underwent highly structured standardized psychometric and clinical assessments which allowed the categorical classification into D, A, S, and E groups. Within each group, the self-scored severity of fatigue experienced during the week preceding the evaluation was compared for patients with and without personality disorders (P). RESULTS: The one-week prevalence of severe fatigue was 38% in D (N ϭ 324) and 45% in D ϩ P (N ϭ 139), p ϭ NS; 29% in A (N ϭ 216) and 29% in A ϩ P (N ϭ 79), p ϭ NS; 33% in E (N ϭ 99) and 32% in E ϩ P (N ϭ 53), p ϭ NS; and 20% in S (N ϭ 209) and 34% in S ϩ P (N ϭ 78), p Ͻ .01. The difference in fatigue severity was ϩ 5% for D ϩ P vs D (p ϭ NS), ϩ 1% for A ϩ P vs A (p ϭ NS), Ϫ 2% for E ϩ P vs E (p ϭ NS) and 32% for S ϩ P vs S (p Ͻ .01). The greater severity of fatigue had a significant contribution to the difference in the 14-item index of somatic distress only for S vs S ϩ P (p ϭ .03) CONCLUSION: Severe fatigue may be a marker of personality pathology in patients with unexplained somatic complaints who do not suffer from depressive, anxiety or eating disorders. SOMATIC DISTRESS OF THE MENTALLY ILL AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO PERSONALITY DISORDERS.N Schmitz, N Hartkamp, W Tress, M Franz, P Manu, Department of Psychosomatics and Psychoterapy, Heinrich-Heine-University, Duesseldorf, Germany; Department of Medicine and Department of Psychiatry, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Glen Oaks, NY PURPOSE: Personality disorders are often invoked by clinicians as a contributing factor to the severity of physical complaints of psychiatric patiens, but the scientific support for this asociation is scant. This study was designed to determine the relationship between somatic distress and the presence of personality pathology in individuals with well-defined psychiatric disorders. METHODS: We analyzed 1437 consective referrals to an academic psychosomatic outpatient unit. Standardized psychometric and clinical evaluations were used to diagnose personality (P), depressive (D), anxiety (A), and somatoform (S) disorders. The assessment of somatic distress was based on the self-rating of the severity of 14 somatic experiences (SE) during the week preceding the evaluation. RESULTS: Compared with D (N ϭ 324), A (N ϭ 216) and S (N ϭ 209), patients with P (N ϭ 392) indicated the lowest severity of somatic distress (p ϭ .001). Patients with the comorbid associations D ϩ P (N ϭ 139) and A ϩ P (N ϭ 79) had experienced milder somatic distress than those with D or A alone (p ϭ .007). In contrast, patients with S...