To investigate whether the preservation of atrioventricular (AV) synchronization matters for quality-of-life during pacemaker treatment we assessed 17 consecutive patients with high degree AV block and preserved sinus node function in a double-blind, long-term crossover study. A questionnaire with regard to cardiovascular symptoms, sleep disturbances, cognitive functioning, physical ability, social interaction, emotional functioning, and self-perceived health was completed after 2 months of atrial synchronous (DDD) and rate modulated ventricular pacing (VVI,R), respectively. A significant improvement in shortness of breath, dizziness and palpitations as well as an improvement of cognitive functioning was observed during DDD pacing. Nine patients preferred the DDD mode and three the VVI,R mode. The remaining five patients did not express any preference. The preference for the DDD mode was explained by a significant reduction of cardiovascular symptoms and an improved self-perceived health, physical ability, and psychological well-being during DDD pacing. All differences in quality-of-life parameters between the two modes of pacing favored the DDD mode and no adverse effects of this mode were found. Thus, the maintenance of AV synchrony adds further symptomatic relief compared to rate increase alone. The results indicate that DDD pacing is the preferred mode of pacing in patients with high degree AV block and preserved sinus node function.

Rate responsive ventricular pacing (VVI,R) has been demonstrated to equal atrial synchronous ventricular pacing (DDD) with regard to hemodynamics and exercise tolerance. Whether the two modes are also comparable, with regard to cardiac metabolic effects, is not yet clear. We assessed central hemodynamics, cardiac sympathetic nerve activity (cardiac norepinephrine overflow), and myocardial oxygen consumption in 16 patients treated with rate responsive atrial synchronous ventricular pacemakers (DDD,R) due to high degree AV block. The study was performed at rest and during supine exercise at two workloads (30 +/- 12 and 68 +/- 24 watts, respectively) during VDD and rate matched VVI pacing (VVIm). Ventricular rates at rest and during both workloads were almost identical. Cardiac output at rest tended to be higher in the VDD mode, due to a slightly higher stroke volume. Central pressures including right atrial pressure and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure were similar in the pacing modes. The coronary sinus blood flow, the coronary sinus arteriovenous oxygen difference, and the myocardial oxygen consumption did not differ between the two pacing modes. Cardiac norepinephrine overflow was similar in the two pacing modes, at rest or during exercise. Thus, we found no significant differences between VDD and VVIm pacing with regard to central hemodynamics, cardiac sympathetic nerve activity (cardiac norepinephrine overflow), or myocardial oxygen consumption either at rest or during moderate exercise.

The relative importance of atrial systole on left ventricular filling was investigated at rest and during exercise in 25 patients with dual chamber pacemakers. The mean blood flow velocity over the mitral valve, the velocities of the rapid filling phase (E), the active filling phase (A), and the E/A ratio were determined by pulsed Doppler-echocardiography. The patients were first examined at rest during AV sequential pacing (DVI) at 70 and 104 beats/min. The investigation was subsequently repeated during atrial synchronous pacing (VDD) at rest and during supine submaximal exercise at workloads adjusted to achieve heart rates corresponding to those during DVI pacing. The mean blood flow velocity at rest did not differ between DVI and VDD pacing at 70 beats/min (0.46 vs 0.49 m/sec). When the resting heart rate was increased to 104 beats/min (DVI) the mean blood flow velocity increased to 0.56 msec (P < 0.001). At a corresponding heart rate during exercise (VDD) the velocity increased to 0.70 msec (P < 0.001). At a resting heart rate of 70 beats/min the E/A ratio (n = 14) did not differ significantly between DVI and VDD pacing. With an increased resting heart rate (DVI) the E/A ratio decreased from 0.94 +/- 0.45 to 0.78 +/- 0.18; NS. When the heart rate increased during exercise (VDD) the E/A ratio increased from 0.75 +/- 0.14 to 0.97 +/- 0.16; P < 0.001. There was a positive correlation between the increase of the mean blood flow velocity and the increase of the E/A ratio during exercise (r = 0.69, P < 0.01). No such correlation was found when the heart rate was changed at rest. Thus, the importance of atrial systole on ventricular filling diminishes during exercise in accordance with increasing blood flow velocity, which by physical principles is related to the kinetic energy. The relative importance of atrial systole is hence inversely correlated to the kinetic energy of the blood flow.

To assess the variation in paced rate during everyday activity and the importance of atrioventricular synchronization (AV synchrony) for submaximal exercise tolerance, atrial synchronous (DDD) and activity rate modulated ventricular (VVI,R) pacing were compared in 17 patients with high degree AV block. The patients were randomly assigned to either mode and evaluated by treadmill exercise to moderate exertion and by 24-hour Holter monitoring after 2 months in the DDD and VVI,R modes, respectively. At the end of the study, the patients were programmed to the pacing mode corresponding to the preferred study period. During the treadmill test, the mean exercise time to submaximal exertion (Borg 5/10), exertion ratings and respiratory rate did not differ between pacing modes despite a significantly lower ventricular rate in the VVI,R mode. The atrial rate during VVI,R pacing was significantly higher than the ventricular rate, but did not differ from the ventricular rate during DDD pacing. There was a diurnal variation in paced rate in both pacing modes. Paced ventricular rate was, however, higher and variation in paced rate greater in DDD compared to VVI,R pacing. Nine patients preferred the DDD mode, three patients preferred the VVI,R mode, while five subjects did not express any preference. The results from this study indicate that the variation in paced rate during activity sensor-driven VVI,R pacing does not match that during DDD pacing neither during everyday activities nor during submaximal treadmill exercise. Nevertheless, no differences in exercise time, Borg ratings, and respiratory rate during submaximal exercise were found. Thus, for most patients with high degree AV block, DDD and VVI,R pacing seem equally satisfactory for submaximal exercise.

Survival in patients paced for high degree AV block has been demonstrated to be influenced by underlying cardiac disease in particular congestive heart failure. One previous study has suggested that dual chamber pacing may improve the vital prognosis for such patients. To investigate this, 74 patients treated with rate adaptive atrial synchronous (VDD) and 74 patients treated with VVI pacemakers for high degree AV block, were retrospectively studied for a mean of 5.4 years by life-table analysis. The two groups had an equal distribution of age, sex, date of pacemaker implantation, and concomitant cardiovascular diseases. Total mortality and estimated survival did not differ between the two groups. The estimated survival in the VDD group at 1, 3, and 5 years for patients without and with congestive heart failure was 94%, 86% and 78%, and 92%, 83% and 72%, respectively. In the VVI group the corresponding values were 95%, 90%, and 83% for patients without congestive heart failure and 82%, 64%, and 47% for those with congestive heart failure (P = 0.008). Compared to the expected survival rate of the general Swedish population, only the VVI group with congestive heart failure, had an excess mortality (P = 0.007). Patients with high degree AV block have a fairly normal vital prognosis irrespective of pacing mode. The prognosis for patients with congestive heart failure was negatively affected by VVI pacing. Thus, for patients with congestive heart failure the choice of pacing mode is of vital importance, whereas for patients without congestive heart failure, other factors such as feeling of well-being and exercise capacity should decide the final choice of pacing mode.