Objective To present an updated version of the Utah Photophobia Symptom Impact Scale version 2 (UPSIS2), providing robust clinical and psychometric validation, to improve headache‐specific evaluation of light sensitivity and headache‐related photophobia. Background The original UPSIS filled a gap in available tools for assessment of headache‐associated light sensitivity by providing patient‐reported evaluation of the impact of light sensitivity on activities of daily living (ADLs). We have since revised the original questionnaire to provide a more robust item construct and refined validation approach. Methods We conducted a psychometric validation of the UPSIS2 through a primary analysis of an online survey of volunteers with recurrent headaches recruited from the University of Utah clinics and surrounding community. Volunteers completed the original UPSIS and UPSIS2 questionnaire versions in addition to measures of headache impact, disability, and frequency. The UPSIS2 now includes a pre‐defined recall period and a 1–4 Likert scale with standardized response anchors to improve clarity. Internal construct validity, external construct validity, and test–retest reliability, were evaluated. Results Responses were obtained from 163 volunteers, with UPSIS2 scores ranging from 15 to 57 (out of a possible 15–60) with a mean (standard deviation) of 32.4 (8.80). Construct validity was satisfactory, as evidenced by sufficient unidimensionality, monotonicity, and local independence. Reliability was excellent, with Rasch test reliability = 0.90 and Cronbach's alpha = 0.92, and an intraclass correlation of 0.79 (95% confidence interval 0.65–0.88) for participants who took the test twice. UPSIS2 correlates well with other headache measures (Spearman's correlations >0.50), as well as the original UPSIS (Spearman's correlation = 0.87), indicating good convergent validity. UPSIS2 scores differ significantly across International Classification of Headache Disorders (third edition) groups, indicating good known group validity. Conclusion The UPSIS2 provides a well‐validated headache‐specific outcome measure for the assessment of photophobia impact on ADLs.

Dizziness after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is commonly attributed to impairment within the vestibular system. However, oculomotor, mobility, and autonomic dysfunction can also contribute to patient-reported dizziness. The purpose of this preliminary study was to examine whether a multimodal battery of assessments could help explain patient-reported dizziness after mTBI. Twenty-three participants with concussion-related symptoms completed the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) to evaluate burden imposed by dizziness on daily activities and a battery of tests designed to incorporate domains that have been shown to contribute to dizziness (e.g., vestibular, oculomotor, balance and mobility, and autonomic dysfunction). Specific outcomes included quantitative variables obtained from: Vestibular Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS); standing for 30 seconds with feet together, eyes closed, with hands on their hips on both firm and foam surfaces; walking for one minute at a comfortable pace; and a Head-up Tilt (HUT) Test. Univariate associations between DHI and individual measures were assessed, and a backwards-stepwise regression model determined the multi-variable association. There were no strong associations and only a few moderate associations between individual functional measure and DHI total score. A total of eight variables had univariate correlation coefficients larger than 0.20 in magnitude. The final model from the backwards-stepwise procedure explained 69% of the variance in DHI and retained only three variables: peak turning speed from the one-minute walk; mean blood pressure (MBP) during the HUT; and the total VOMS score. Isolated assessments of individual domains of function have weak-to-moderate associations with post-mTBI dizziness. Conversely, a multivariable model that contained measures of mobility, autonomic function, and symptomatic complaints to vestibular and ocular provocation explained 69% of the variance in dizziness. These results suggest that dizziness is physiologically heterogeneous in nature and support the use of multi-domain assessments in patients with dizziness after mTBI.

PurposePeripheral neuropathies with autonomic nervous system involvement are a recognized cause of gastrointestinal dysmotility for a wide spectrum of diseases. Recent advances in wireless motility capsule testing allow improved sampling of regional and whole gut motility to aid in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal motility disorders and may provide additional insight into segment-specific enteric involvement of peripheral neuropathies affecting autonomic nervous system function.MethodsWe utilized standardized autonomic nervous system (ANS) reflex assessment and wireless motility capsule testing to evaluate 20 individuals with idiopathic autonomic neuropathy and unexplained gastrointestinal symptoms. Additionally, we examined the relationship between quantifiable autonomic neuropathy and gastrointestinal dysmotility at specific neuroanatomical levels. Symptom profiles were evaluated using the 31-item Composite Autonomic Symptom Score questionnaire (COMPASS-31) and compared to wireless motility capsule data.ResultsWe found that transit times were predominately abnormal (delayed) in the foregut (10 of 20; 50%), while contractility abnormalities were far more prominent in the hindgut (17 of 20; 85%), and that motility and symptom patterns, as assessed by the COMPASS-31 GI domain items, generally corresponded. Finally, we also found that there was neuroanatomical overlap in the presence of autonomic reflex abnormalities and WMC-based transit and/or contractility abnormalities.ConclusionsWe found that transit times were predominately abnormal in the foregut and midgut, while contractility abnormalities were far more prominent in the hindgut in individuals with idiopathic autonomic neuropathy. There was a high rate of agreement in segmental wireless motility capsule data with neuroanatomically corresponding standardized ANS function measures (e.g., cardiovagal, sudomotor, adrenergic). Expanded sudomotor testing, including additional neuroanatomical segments, could provide additional indirect assessment of visceral involvement in ANS dysfunction.