No abstract

The present study focuses on the impact of the underlying RANS turbulence model in the Zonal Detached Eddy Simulation (ZDES) method when used for secondary flow prediction. This is carried out in light of three issues commonly investigated for hybrid RANS/LES methods (detection and protection of attached boundary layer, emergence, and growth of resolved turbulent fluctuations and accurate prediction of separation front due to progressive adverse pressure gradient). The studied configuration is the first rotor of a high pressure compressor. Three different turbulence modelings (Spalart and Allmaras model (SA), Menter model with (SST) and without (BSL) shear stress correction) are assessed as ZDES underlying turbulence model and also as turbulence model of unsteady RANS simulations. Whatever the underlying turbulence model, the ZDES behaves well with respect to the first two issues as the boundary layers appear effectively shielded and the RANS-to-LES switch is close downstream of trailing edges and separation fronts leading to a quick LES treatment of wakes and shear layers. Both tip leakage and corner flows are strongly influenced by the Navier–Stokes resolution approach (unsteady RANS vs. ZDES) but the underlying turbulence modelling (SA vs. SST vs. BSL) impacts mainly the junction flow near the hub for both approaches. ZDES underlying turbulence model choice appear essential since it leads to quite different corner flow separation topologies and so to inversion of the downstream stagnation pressure radial gradient.