No abstract

Linked Content This article is linked to Strik et al paper. To view this article visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.13994.

OBJECTIVES: Pathological gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is a known risk factor for bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) after lung transplantation. This study aimed at determining whether functional esophageal evaluation might predict BOS occurrence and survival in this setting. METHODS: Ninety-three patients who underwent esophageal high-resolution manometry and 24-hour pH-impedance monitoring within the first year after lung transplantation were retrospectively included. A univariable analysis was performed to evaluate the parameters associated with GER disease and BOS occurrence. The Cox regression model was used to identify the prognostic factors of death or retransplantation. RESULTS: Thirteen percent of patients exhibited major esophageal motility disorders and 20% pathological GER. GER occurrence was associated with younger age, cystic fibrosis, and hypotensive esophagogastric junction. Within a median follow-up of 62 months, 10 patients (11%) developed BOS, and no predictive factors were identified. At the end of the follow-up, 10 patients died and 1 underwent retransplantation. The 5-year cumulative survival rate without retransplantation was lower in patients with major esophageal motility disorders compared with that in those without (75% vs 90%, P = 0.01) and in patients who developed BOS compared with that in those without (66% vs 91%; P = 0.005). However, in multivariable analysis, major esophageal motility disorders and BOS were no longer significant predictors of survival without retransplantation. DISCUSSION: Major esophageal motility disorders and BOS were associated with allograft survival in lung transplantation in the univariable analysis. Although the causes of this association remain to be determined, this observation confirms that esophageal motor dysfunction should be evaluated in the context of lung transplantation.

Background Fecal incontinence is a disabling condition affecting up to 20% of women. Objective We investigated fecal incontinence assessment in both inflammatory bowel disease and non-inflammatory bowel disease patients to propose a diagnostic approach for inflammatory bowel disease trials. Methods We searched on Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane Library for all studies on adult inflammatory bowel disease and non-inflammatory bowel disease patients reporting data on fecal incontinence assessment from January 2009 to December 2019. Results In total, 328 studies were included; 306 studies enrolled non-inflammatory bowel disease patients and 22 studies enrolled inflammatory bowel disease patients. In non-inflammatory bowel disease trials the most used tools were the Wexner score, fecal incontinence quality of life questionnaire, Vaizey score and fecal incontinence severity index (in 187, 91, 62 and 33 studies). Anal manometry was adopted in 41.2% and endoanal ultrasonography in 34.0% of the studies. In 142 studies (46.4%) fecal incontinence evaluation was performed with a single instrument, while in 64 (20.9%) and 100 (32.7%) studies two or more instruments were used. In inflammatory bowel disease studies the Wexner score, Vaizey score and inflammatory bowel disease quality of life questionnaire were the most commonly adopted tools (in five (22.7%), five (22.7%) and four (18.2%) studies). Anal manometry and endoanal ultrasonography were performed in 45.4% and 18.2% of the studies. Conclusion Based on prior validation and experience, we propose to use the Wexner score as the first step for fecal incontinence assessment in inflammatory bowel disease trials. Anal manometry and/or endoanal ultrasonography should be taken into account in the case of positive questionnaires.

Background: Subcutaneous infliximab and vedolizumab formulations have been developed for maintenance therapy in inflammatory bowel disease. The objective of this study was to explore the inflammatory bowel disease patient’s acceptance for switching from intravenous infliximab or vedolizumab to subcutaneous, as well as to describe the causes of refusal or, conversely, the factors associated with acceptance. Methods: Patients were prospectively recruited between June 2021 and March 2022 during their infusion of infliximab or vedolizumab in the Medical Day Hospital of Nancy University Hospital. Adult patients with an established diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease in clinical remission were eligible for inclusion in this study if they had been treated with intravenous infliximab or vedolizumab for at least six months. Results: One hundred and thirty patients were included in this study. Thirty-six patients (27.7%) received vedolizumab and ninety-four patients (72.3%) received infliximab. Median duration of treatment at inclusion was 7.0 years [3.0–11.0]. In this cohort, 77.7% of patients accepted the switch from intravenous infliximab or vedolizumab to subcutaneous. The main reasons for patient’s refusal for switching from intravenous to subcutaneous formulation were fear of loss of efficacy, a more spaced-out medical follow-up, increased frequency of administration, and self-administered injection. A short duration of treatment was associated with a high switch acceptance rate (odd ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval (CI)) = 0.9 (0.8–0.9); p = 0.0002). Conclusion: A large majority of the patients included accepted the switch of their treatment with infliximab or vedolizumab from the intravenous form to the subcutaneous form. This study identified one predictor influencing the acceptance rate in inflammatory bowel disease population: short treatment duration. Subcutaneous infliximab and vedolizumab hold potential for greater patient flexibility by self-administration, reducing travel and hospital attendance for infusion.