In response to calls in the literature for more collaborative practice in interpreter training, this paper describes the design, implementation and part of the evaluation of an innovative joint training intervention for interpreting students (Master’s level) and 3rd- and 4th-year medical students at Ghent University. In order to assess the development of the students’ knowledge and skills, we employed self-efficacy questionnaires; the training intervention was evaluated in a debriefing session with trainers from both fields. A development in skills that involve direct interaction with the primary participants and address specific communicative goals was noted. Our initial evaluation suggests that interprofessional education and collaborative practice in interpreter training can create the conditions for interpreting students to develop a more insightful and reflective approach to their interpreting practice.
This paper reports on an interdisciplinary training initiative involving student interpreters and medical students. It provides qualitative evidence on how the stakeholders involved perceive the effects of including foreign-language speaking simulated patients (SPs) in medical interpreter training. We conducted three focus group interviews, during which we explored the perspectives of different stakeholders involved in the interdisciplinary training. The first focus group involved three clinical communication trainers and four interpreter trainers, the second focus group comprised eight student interpreters and the third focus group involved three SPs. The data was analysed using NVivo 12 software. The results reveal that the presence of foreign-language speaking SPs generated an increased level of authenticity, a higher degree of affective social distance, an increased interactional and linguistic complexity, increased (language) learning potential and an increased level of stress vis à vis regular interpreting classes in which traditional role plays were used. All stakeholders deem working with foreign-language speaking SPs highly beneficial, as the added value and advantages of working with SPs outweighed the disadvantages.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.