IntroductionsBreast cancer is the most common type of cancer in women and the risk increases with age. As in other tumors the development of breast carcinoma is associated with systemic inflammation. The systemic inflammatory response can change with tumor growth, invasion, angiogenesis and metastasis. İnflammatory markers such as c reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin 6 (IL 6) are increased in breast cancer patients and a have adverse effect on survey (Balta et al., 2013).Benign proliferative breast disease (BPBD) is most common in women who are in their thirties to fifties. Various sizes of cysts, adenosis, hyperplasia with atypia and/or without atypia and apocrine metaplasia can be seen in BPBD on microscopic examination. Despite the strong association between BPBD and breast cancer development, the exact causes of BPBD are still unknown. Hormonal imbalance especially increased estrogen via to progestin is thought to play a role in development of BPBD. Breast cancer risk related with proliferative breast disease. Several studies showed that inflammation plays an important role in the development of BPBD and early breast carcinogenesis (Catsburg et al., 2014).Complete blood count and its subtype neutrophil count and neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR) are an indicator of systemic inflammation (Guthrie et al., 2013).
AbstractBackground: The aim of this study was to determine diagnostic and prognostic roles of the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in breast cancer patients. To date, data are limited on associations of primary breast carcinoma (PBC) and benign proliferative breast disease (BPBD) with preoperative NLR values. Materials and Methods: Our study covered of 120 female patients with PBC and 50 with BPBD. Diagnostic values of NLR were estimated using sensitivity, specificity and areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC). Results: NLR values were significantly higher in the PBC patients than in those with BPBD, with an AUC of 0.668 in the PBC case. The optimal cut-off for NLR was 2.96 and this was validated in the testing set, giving a sensitivity and a specificity of 79.7% and 76.2%, respectively, in PBC patients. Conclusions: Preoperative high NLR is a significant diagnostic predictor of distinction of breast cancer from BPBD and elevated NLR is also an important prognostic marker for primary invasive breast cancer.
Objective: Providing the consistency between the results from cytologic examination (Pap test) of cervical lesions with those of follow-up biopsies is an important quality control method. We investigated diagnostic difficulties and reasons in cytohistopathologic practice in this study. Material and Method: We included 43 patients cytologically diagnosed as LsiL or HsiL between 200-2007 with negative subsequent biopsy results. Results: We were able to gain access to the cytological material of 37 cases and 9 of these received different diagnoses from the initial diagnoses. re-evaluation of the biopsies provided a diagnosis of siL in 9 of 43 cases. Conclusion: The reason for the inconsistent histopathologic diagnoses was misinterpreting in 6 cases and microscopic sampling error due to the lack of serial cuts in 3 cases. We detected %2 false negatives on biopsies mostly as a result of misinterpretation. The squamocolumnar junction was not present in cases that had previously been diagnosed as negative. in conclusion, serial cuts must be evaluated by an experienced pathologist specialized in gynecopathology in cervical biopsies with positive cytology results and the absence of the squamocolumnar junction must be reported.
We revealed an important role of autophagy in thyroid carcinogenesis, as evidenced by the high rate of BECN1 immunoreactivity in PTC and FC. Moreover, we found that autophagy plays a more important role in PTC, as evidenced by the high immunoreactivity rates. According to our results, BECN1 is a more specific marker than HBME-1 in PTC and has a higher correlation with Ki-67. In routine studies, BECN1 will be more helpful than HBME-1 in the diagnosis of PTC.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.