No abstract

The aim of the study was to obtain anatomic bone healing and restoration of the patient's premorbid occlusion in complex facial fractures or comminuted facial fracture. Ten patients who applied to a tertiary health care clinic with complex or comminuted fractures, and mandibular fractures combined with condylar fractures which may impair the occlusal harmony were included in the study.After the preparation of premorbid occlusal splints and direct bonded orthodontic brackets, splint-assisted reduction and internal fixation have been performed. The treatment protocol was completed with 4 to 6 weeks of intermaxillary fixation over the splint. All fracture lines showed complete bone healing, without major complications requiring further treatment. Complications included a minor degree of malocclusion in one of the panfacial fracture patients and slight avascular resorption of the condyle in one of the avulsive open comminuted mandibular fracture patients.Using orthodontic splints and direct bonded brackets to obtain and maintain delicate reduction is an efficacious method for the prevention of occlusal disharmony and aesthetic impairments in comminuted lower facial unit and complicated facial fracture patients.

Objective:The purpose of this study is to compare the accuracy of the treatment simulation module of Quick Ceph Studio (QCS) program to the actual treatment results in Class II Division 1 patients.Design:Retrospective study.Materials and Methods:Twenty-six skeletal Class II patients treated with functional appliances were included. T0 and T1 lateral cephalograms were digitized using QCS. Before applying treatment simulation to the digitized cephalograms, the actual T0-T1 difference was calculated for the SNA, SNB, ANB angles, maxillary incisor inclination, and protrusion and mandibular incisor inclination and protrusion values. Next, using the treatment simulation module, the aforementioned values for the T0 cephalograms were manually entered to match the actual T1 values taking into account the T0-T1 differences. Paired sample t-test were applied to determine the difference between actual and treatment simulation measurements.Results:No significant differences were found for the anteroposterior location of the landmarks. Upper lip, soft tissue A point, soft tissue pogonion, and soft tissue B point measurements showed statistically significant difference between actual and treatment simulation in the vertical plane.Conclusion:Quick Ceph program was reliable in terms of reflecting the sagittal changes that would probably occur with treatment and growth. However, vertical positions of the upper lip, soft tissue pogonion, soft tissue A point, and soft tissue B point were statistically different from actual results.

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the inflammatory effects of conventional and laser soldering methods on periodontal tissues in orthodontics. Materials and Method: Forty specimens were acquired from 10 patients whose treatment plan consisted of extraction of 4 first premolars. Before performing the extractions, a transpalatal arch (TPA) for the upper first molars and a lingual arch for the lower first molars were placed for anchorage purposes. Upper left and lower right first molar bands were soldered using the laser welding (LW) technique, and upper right and lower left first molar bands were soldered using the conventional silver soldering technique (CSS). Gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) analysis was used for determining the effects of welding procedures on periodontal tissues. All variables were analyzed by nonparametric tests. Results: Myeloperoxidase levels ranged between 2.46 and 3.56 for the CSS group and between 2.20 and 3.39 for the LW group; nitric oxide levels ranged between 4.92 and 7.13 for the CSS group and between 4.39 and 6.78 for the LW group. Both levels showed the highest level on the seventh day. Plaque index and gingival index scores ranged between 0 and 1 for all specimens. Bleeding on probing levels ranged between 45% and 75% and between 60% and 75% for the CSS group and LW group, respectively. Conclusion: There was no significant difference between laser welding and conventional soldering methods in terms of periodontal tissue response. (Turkish J Orthod 2014;27:70-75)