No abstract

No abstract

One of the most important considerations to be considered in the design of energy efficient buildings is the thickness of the insulation to be applied to the building. In this study the existing building stock in Turkey has been investigated depending on parameters such as the height and the area. A model building has been created covering all of these buildings. Fuel emission reduction of combustion system was calculated in the case of insulation applied to this model building. Heat loss of the existing building stock and exhaust emissions and the contribution to the country's economy with the model building methodology are also determined. The results show that the optimum insulation thicknesses vary between 3.21 and 7.12 cm, the energy savings vary between 9.23 US$/m 2 and 43.95 US$/m 2 , and the payback periods vary between 1 and 8.8 years depending on the regions. As a result of the study when the optimum insulation thickness is applied in the model building, the total energy savings for the country are calculated to be 41.7 billion US$. And also total CO 2 emissions for the country are calculated to be 57.2 billion kg CO 2 per year after insulation.

No abstract

In this study, the optimum insulation thickness was calculated for the heating season for external walls in the different directions of a building. For this reason, a building used for housing in Istanbul, Turkey was taken as model. The indoor and outdoor temperatures, along with the interior and exterior surface temperatures of the building's external walls, were continuously measured using thermocouples and recorded in four different directions throughout the year. The effects of solar radiation, which vary based on the direction, were assessed for the heat transfer through the external walls. The results of this study indicate that the optimum insulation thickness for the north, south, west, and east facing walls should be 6.47, 2.87, 6.97, and 6.98 cm, respectively, based on the differences in the amount of solar radiation exposure of the walls in the different directions. The optimum insulation thickness of the building's external wall was calculated as 5.25 cm, regardless of its direction. An economic analysis of the thermal insulation cost was conducted using the P 1-P 2 method, and then the payback periods were calculated. The heating energy consumption of the building designed using the optimum insulation thicknesses, as identified separately based on the direction, decreased by 17%, compared to the present building with 3 cm of thermal insulation.