The clinical success of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in both resected and metastatic melanoma has confirmed the validity of therapeutic strategies that boost the immune system to counteract cancer. However, half of patients with metastatic disease treated with even the most aggressive regimen do not derive durable clinical benefit. Thus, there is a critical need for predictive biomarkers that can identify individuals who are unlikely to benefit with high accuracy so that these patients may be spared the toxicity of treatment without the likely benefit of response. Ideally, such an assay would have a fast turnaround time and minimal invasiveness. Here, we utilize a novel platform that combines mass spectrometry with an artificial intelligence-based data processing engine to interrogate the blood glycoproteome in melanoma patients before receiving ICI therapy. We identify 143 biomarkers that demonstrate a difference in expression between the patients who died within six months of starting ICI treatment and those who remained progression-free for three years. We then develop a glycoproteomic classifier that predicts benefit of immunotherapy (HR=2.7; p=0.026) and achieves a significant separation of patients in an independent cohort (HR=5.6; p=0.027). To understand how circulating glycoproteins may affect efficacy of treatment, we analyze the differences in glycosylation structure and discover a fucosylation signature in patients with shorter overall survival (OS). We then develop a fucosylation-based model that effectively stratifies patients (HR=3.5; p=0.0066). Together, our data demonstrate the utility of plasma glycoproteomics for biomarker discovery and prediction of ICI benefit in patients with metastatic melanoma and suggest that protein fucosylation may be a determinant of anti-tumor immunity.

Glycosylation is the most common form of post-translational modification of proteins, critically affecting their structure and function. Using liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry for high-resolution site-specific quantification of glycopeptides coupled with high-throughput artificial intelligence-powered data processing, we analyzed differential protein glycoisoform distributions of 597 abundant serum glycopeptides and nonglycosylated peptides in 50 individuals who had been seriously ill with COVID-19 and in 22 individuals who had recovered after an asymptomatic course of COVID-19. As additional comparison reference phenotypes, we included 12 individuals with a history of infection with a common cold coronavirus, 16 patients with bacterial sepsis, and 15 healthy subjects without history of coronavirus exposure. We found statistically significant differences, at FDR < 0.05, for normalized abundances of 374 of the 597 peptides and glycopeptides interrogated between symptomatic and asymptomatic COVID-19 patients. Similar statistically significant differences were seen when comparing symptomatic COVID-19 patients to healthy controls (350 differentially abundant peptides and glycopeptides) and common cold coronavirus seropositive subjects (353 differentially abundant peptides and glycopeptides). Among healthy controls and sepsis patients, 326 peptides and glycopeptides were found to be differentially abundant, of which 277 overlapped with biomarkers that showed differential expression between symptomatic COVID-19 cases and healthy controls. Among symptomatic COVID-19 cases and sepsis patients, 101 glycopeptide and peptide biomarkers were found to be statistically significantly abundant. Using both supervised and unsupervised machine learning techniques, we found specific glycoprotein profiles to be strongly predictive of symptomatic COVID-19 infection. LASSO-regularized multivariable logistic regression and K-means clustering yielded accuracies of 100% in an independent test set and of 96% overall, respectively. Our findings are consistent with the interpretation that a majority of glycoprotein modifications observed which are shared among symptomatic COVID-19 and sepsis patients likely represent a generic consequence of a severe systemic immune and inflammatory state. However, there are glycoisoform changes that are specific and particular to severe COVID-19 infection. These may be representative of either COVID-19-specific consequences or susceptibility to or predisposition for a severe course of the disease. Our findings support the potential value of glycoproteomic biomarkers in the biomedical understanding and, potentially, the clinical management of serious acute infectious conditions.

e21148 Background: Protein glycosylation is the most abundant and complex form of post-translational protein modification. Glycosylation profoundly affects protein structure, conformation, and function. The elucidation of the potential role of differential protein glycosylation as biomarkers has so far been limited by the technical complexity of generating and interpreting this information. We have recently established a novel, powerful platform that combines liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry with a proprietary artificial-intelligence-based data processing engine that allows, for the first time, highly scalable interrogation of the glycoproteome. Methods: Using this platform, we interrogated 694 glycopeptide (GP) and non-glycosylated peptide transitions derived from 74 serum proteins in pre-treatment peripheral blood samples from a cohort of 316 individuals with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (128 females, 187 males, 1 with unknown sex, median age 66 years, age range 31-89 years, stage 0-4 N’s: 1 / 99 / 80 / 84 / 49, 3 missing) and a comparison cohort of 194 healthy control samples (102 females, 92 males, median age 52 years, age range 30-63 years). Age- and sex-adjusted differential expression analysis for 596 normalized biomarkers were performed to evaluate statistically significant differential abundances using an FDR-adjusted q-value of 0.05 as a cutoff. Repeated five-fold cross-validated LASSO-regularized logistic regression was performed to create a multivariable classifier that predicts whether a serum sample belongs to the healthy or NSCLC cohort. Results: We identified 432 biomarkers with significant abundance differences at FDR ≤ 0.05 between samples with NSCLC and healthy controls. Using 70% of the complete cohort (balanced by case/control membership, NSCLC stage, sex, and age quartile) as a training set, we selected a total of 375 glycopeptide and non-glycosylated peptide biomarker features that remained differentially expressed at FDR-adjusted q-value ≤ 0.05 as input into a LASSO-regularized multivariable classifier. This resulting in a 19-biomarker model exhibiting an accuracy of 94.8% (96.9% sensitivity, 91.2% specificity) and AUC of 0.989. This classifier was validated in an independent test set comprising the remaining 30% of subjects, yielding an accuracy of 94.5% (95.5% sensitivity, 93.0% specificity) and AUC of 0.975. Sensitivity in the test set was 100% / 96% / 99% / 96% / 94% / 10%, in stages 0-4 and missing, respectively. Conclusions: Our results indicate that glycoproteomic biomarkers can be leveraged as a strong liquid biopsy-based screening tool for patients at high risk of NSCLC, as an alternative to imaging modalities.

9545 Background: Protein glycosylation is the most abundant and complex form of post-translational protein modification. Glycosylation profoundly affects protein structure, conformation, and function. The elucidation of the potential role of differential protein glycosylation as biomarkers has so far been limited by the technical complexity of generating and interpreting this information. We have recently established a novel, powerful platform that combines liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry with a proprietary artificial-intelligence-based data processing engine that allows, for the first time highly scalable interrogation of the glycoproteome. Methods: Using this platform, we interrogated 526 glycopeptide (GP) signatures derived from 75 serum proteins in pretreatment blood samples from a cohort of 205 individuals (66 females, 139 males, age range 24 to 97 years) with metastatic malignant melanoma treated either with nivolumab plus ipilimumab (95 patients) or pembrolizumab (110 patients) immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. Results: In an optimized assay containing 27 glycopeptides and 20 non-glycosylated peptides, we identified 14 GPs with abundance differences at FDR q≤0.05 with regard to PFS. Using 40% of the cohort as a training set and selecting 12 glycopeptide and non-glycosylated peptide biomarker features of the 47 total by LASSO shrinkage, we created a multivariable-model-based classifier for PFS that yielded a hazard ratio (HR) for prediction of likely ICI benefit of 7.5 at p < 0.0001. This classifier was validated in the test set comprised of the held-out 60% of patients, yielding a HR of 4.7 at a similar p-value for separating patients likely benefiting from ICI therapy and those likely not benefiting from ICI therapy (50% PFS of 18 months vs. 3 months based on classifier score above/below cutoff). This classifier has a sensitivity of > 99% to predict likely ICI benefit, while still performing at a specificity of 26%, thus helping to safely reduce ultimately unnecessary and non-beneficial exposure to these agents of one in four who otherwise would unnecessarily be exposed to them. Conclusions: Our results indicate that glycoproteomics holds a strong promise as a predictor for checkpoint inhibitor treatment benefit that appears to significantly outperform other currently pursued biomarker approaches in this context.

Background: Protein glycosylation is the most common and complex form of post-translational protein modification. Glycosylation profoundly affects protein structure, conformation, and function. The elucidation of the potential role of differential protein glycosylation as biomarkers has been limited by the technical complexity of generating and interpreting this information. We have recently established a novel, powerful platform that combines liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry with a proprietary artificial-intelligence-based data processing engine that allows, for the first time, highly scalable interrogation of the glycoproteome. Here we report the performance of this platform to predict likely benefit from immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Our platform was utilized to assess 532 glycopeptide (GP) and peptide signatures representing 75 serum proteins in pretreatment blood samples from a cohort of 123 individuals (54 females, 69 males, age range 30 to 88 years). Inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of unresectable stage 3 or 4 NSCLC, treatment with pembrolizumab monotherapy (26 patients), or treatment with combination pembrolizumab-chemotherapy (97 patients). Overall survival (OS) data were available for all patients. Results: An ensemble multivariable-model-based glycoproteomic classifier consisting of 7 GP and non-glycosylated peptide biomarker features selected from a generalized additive model for OS was developed using ≈2/3rds of the full cohort (n=88) and validated in the remainder of patients (n=35). The classifier yielded similar statistical significance in Cox regression analysis for separating patients who are likely to benefit from ICI therapy from those who are not, to accurately predict likely ICI benefit with a sensitivity of &gt;95% while performing at a specificity of 33% to predict those who are unlikely to benefit. Results were further analyzed in patients with either non-squamous or squamous NSCLC with first-line therapy (n=98). The classifier yielded a hazard ratio (HR) for prediction of likely ICI benefit of 3.6 with median OS of 13.9 vs. 4.2 months, and of 3.5 with median OS of 13.5 vs. 4.5 months in the entire cohort and the first-line treated patients, respectively. Conclusions: The glycoproteomic classifier described here predicts with high sensitivity which patients are likely to benefit from ICI therapy. In addition to potentially reducing the use of ICIs in a safe manner in patients who would be unnecessarily subjected to possible adverse drug reactions, our classifier simultaneously has the potential of reducing the burden of health care expenditures. Our results indicate that glycoproteomics holds a strong promise as a predictor for ICI treatment benefit which appears to significantly outperform other currently pursued biomarker approaches. Citation Format: Klaus Lindpaintner, Chad Pickering, Alan Mitchell, Gege Xu, Xin Cong, Daniel Serie. A peripheral blood-based glycoproteomic predictor of checkpoint inhibitor treatment benefit in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 5314.