The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics of fentanyl, alfentanil, and sufentanil in isoflurane-anesthetized cats. Six adult cats were used. Anesthesia was induced and maintained with isoflurane in oxygen. End-tidal isoflurane concentration was set at 2% and adjusted as required due to spontaneous movement. Fentanyl (10 μg/kg), alfentanil (100 μg/kg), or sufentanil (1 μg/kg) was administered intravenously as a bolus, on separate days. Blood samples were collected immediately before and for 8 h following drug administration. Plasma drug concentration was determined using liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. Compartment models were fitted to concentration-time data. A 3-compartment model best fitted the concentration-time data for all drugs, except for 1 cat in the sufentanil group (excluded from analysis). The volume of the central compartment and the volume of distribution at steady-state (L/kg) [mean ± SEM (range)], the clearance (mL/min/kg) [harmonic mean ± pseudo-SD (range)], and the terminal half-life (min) [median (range)] were 0.25 ± 0.04 (0.09-0.34), 2.18 ± 0.16 (1.79-2.83), 18.6 ± 5.0 (15-29.8), and 151 (115-211) for fentanyl; 0.10 ± 0.01 (0.07-0.14), 0.89 ± 0.16 (0.68-1.83), 11.6 ± 2.6 (9.2-15.8), and 144 (118-501) for alfentanil; and 0.06 ± 0.01 (0.04-0.10), 0.77 ± 0.07 (0.63-0.99), 17.6 ± 4.3 (13.9-24.3), and 54 (46-76) for sufentanil. Differences in clearance and volume of distribution result in similar terminal half-lives for fentanyl and alfentanil, longer than for sufentanil.

Objective To test whether naltrexone, an opioid receptor antagonist, affects the minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of isoflurane in cats, a species that is relatively resistant to the general anesthetic sparing effects of most opioids. Study design Randomized, crossover, placebo-controlled, blinded experimental design. Animals Six healthy adult cats weighing 4.9 ± 0.7 kg. Methods The cats were studied twice. In the first study, baseline isoflurane MAC was measured in duplicate. The drug (saline control or 0.6 mg kg−1 naltrexone) was administered IV every 40–60 minutes, and isoflurane MAC was re-measured. In the second study, cats received the second drug treatment using identical methods two weeks later. Results Isoflurane MAC was 2.03 ± 0.12% and was unchanged from baseline following saline or naltrexone administration. Conclusion and clinical relevance MAC was unaffected by naltrexone. Because MAC in cats is unaffected by at least some mu-opioid agonists and antagonists, spinal neurons that are directly modulated by mu-opioid receptors in this species cannot be the neuroanatomic sites responsible for immobility from inhaled anesthetics.