No abstract

Background. Chinese oral herbal paste has been widely used in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, the treatment effects of herbal paste were controversial and lack evidence to support its clinical use. This study aims to systematically assess the efficacy and safety of Chinese oral herbal paste for the treatment of stable COPD. Methods. PubMed, Web of Science, CENTRAL, EMBASE, CNKI, VIP, CBM, and WANFANG database in addition to two websites of clinical trial registry were searched from respective inception to August 2019. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) studying Chinese herbal paste for the treatment of stable COPD were included. Methodological quality was assessed based on Cochrane risk of bias and GRADE approach. Data were analyzed using RevMan 5.3. Results. A total of 19 RCTs with 1303 individuals compared Chinese oral herbal paste and Western medicine (WM) with WM alone were included for meta-analysis. The review showed compared with WM alone, the combination of herbal paste and WM reduced exacerbation frequency. Subgroup analyses showed that after two to three months of treatment, compared with WM alone, Chinese herbal paste plus WM significantly decreased the St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) scores, COPD assessment test (CAT) scores, and scores of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) syndrome, and improved clinical effective rates, lung function, and 6-minute walk distance. No serious adverse events related to herbal paste were reported. Conclusion. Current evidence showed that Chinese oral herbal paste may be an effective and well-tolerated adjuvant therapy for stable COPD. Considering the risks of bias and heterogeneity, more high-quality, well-designed RCTs are still needed.

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common chronic respiratory disease with high morbidity and mortality placing heavy social and economic burden. As a kind of complementary therapy for the treatment of stable COPD, Chinese oral herbal paste has been widely used and studied. The study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of herbal paste in the treatment of stable COPD, and to provide evidence for its clinical application. Methods: We will electronically search databases, including Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science, EMBASE, PubMed, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WANFANG Database, Chinese Scientific and Technological Periodical Database (VIP), and Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM), from respective inception to June 2019 to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of Chinese oral herbal paste for the treatment of stable COPD. The websites of Chinese clinical trial registry and international clinical trial registry, the reference lists of the retrieved articles, conference proceedings, and gray literature will also be collected. The quality of life, symptom scores, and exacerbation frequency will be measured as primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes include scores of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) syndrome, clinical effective rates according to criteria in TCM, changes in lung function, 6-minute walking distance, and safety analysis. The Cochrane bias risk assessment and the GRADE method will be used to assess the quality of the original studies included. Merging analysis of data will be performed using Rev Man 5.3 software. Results: The systematic review will provide an evidence on the clinical efficacy and safety of Chinese oral herbal paste for the treatment of stable COPD, and will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. Conclusion: The study will confirm whether Chinese oral herbal paste is an effective and safe intervention for the prevention and treatment of stable COPD.

Background:Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) has been shown to be effective in the treatment of stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) by published meta-analyses. However, disease outcomes were inconsistent and heterogeneity was observed attributed to placebo-controlled studies. We present a protocol for a systematic review aiming to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of CHM comparing to placebo in the treatment of stable COPD, to provide robust evidence for the use of CHM in COPD.Methods:We will comprehensively search the following 9 databases from inception to March 2019: Web of Science, PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WANFANG Database, Chinese Scientific and Technological Periodical Database (VIP) and Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM), and the Cochrane Library database. All clinical randomized controlled trials comparing CHM to placebo for the treatment of stable COPD in English or Chinese will be included. The primary outcome will be quality of life, symptom score and exacerbation frequency, and the secondary outcomes include traditional Chinese medicine syndrome score and effective rate, lung function, 6-minute walk distance, and adverse events. Data extraction and quality assessment will be performed independently by 2 reviewers. Data synthesis and risk of bias will be assessed using the Review Manager software. This protocol will be conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidance.Results:This systematic review and meta-analysis will provide a high-quality comprehensive evaluation of the efficacy and safety based on current literature evidence of CHM intervention for stable COPD.Conclusion:The conclusion of this study will present the evidence of whether CHM is an effective and safe intervention for stable COPD patients.