ABSTRACT. Different forms of p210 are produced by alternative splicing, namely b2a2 and b3a2. There have been many contrasting data establishing a relationship between the two Bcr/Abl transcripts and platelet counts and also response to treatment. However, the data published to date have been on a small group of patients. The aim of the present study was to determine whether there was any difference between clinical and hematological parameters at diagnosis between the two Bcr/Abl fusion transcripts in our population, and whether the two transcripts responded differently or similarly to imatinib treatment. RT-PCR was performed in 202 cases for detection of Bcr/Abl transcripts in newly diagnosed chronic myelogenous leukemia cases in one year. The two transcripts were compared and correlated with clinical, hematological and FISH data and with response to treatment. A total of 138 cases were of b3a2 and 64 were of b2a2 transcript. There was no correlation between the hemato- logical parameters and the type of transcript. There was a significant association of blast crisis with b2a2, especially with myeloid blast crisis. When compared to FISH results, 10% of b3a2 were found to have a significant association with 5'Abl deletion as compared to 3% of b2a2. On analyzing the therapeutic response, we did not find any difference between the two transcripts. In conclusion, our findings confirm that the b3a2 type transcript is not significantly associated with thrombocytosis, that the short transcript, b2a2, occurs with acute phase, i.e., blast crisis, and that there is no difference in treatment response between the two transcripts. However, further studies are required to understand the molecular pathways involved in the Bcr/Abl mechanism.
Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is characterized by a reciprocal translocation t(15;17)(q22;q21) leading to the disruption of Promyelocytic leukemia (PML) and Retionic Acid Receptor Alpha (RARA) followed by reciprocal PML–RARA fusion in 90% of the cases. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has overcome the hurdles of unavailability of abnormal and/or lack of metaphase cells, and detection of cryptic, submicroscopic rearrangements. In the present study, besides diagnostic approach we sought to analyze these cases for identification and characterization of cryptic rearrangements, deletion variants and unknown RARA translocation variants by application of D-FISH and RARA break-apart probe strategy on interphase and metaphase cells in a large series of 200 cases of APL. Forty cases (20%) had atypical PML–RARA and/or RARA variants. D-FISH with PML/RARA probe helped identification of RARA insertion to PML. By application of D-FISH on metaphase cells, we documented that translocation of 15 to 17 leads to 17q deletion which results in loss of reciprocal fusion and/or residual RARA on der(17). Among the complex variants of t(15;17), PML–RARA fusion followed by residual RARA insertion closed to PML–RARA on der(15) was unique and unusual. FISH with break-apart RARA probe on metaphase cells was found to be a very efficient strategy to detect unknown RARA variant translocations like t(11;17)(q23;q21), t(11;17)(q13;q21) and t(2;17)(p21;q21). These findings proved that D-FISH and break-apart probe strategy has potential to detect primary as well as secondary additional aberrations of PML, RARA and other additional loci. The long-term clinical follow-up is essential to evaluate the clinical importance of these findings.
Both RT-PCR and FISH are important for the diagnosis of APL cases, as both techniques complement each other in the absence or failure of any one of them. However, RT-PCR is more sensitive than FISH for the detection of minimal residual disease in the long-term monitoring of these patients. The present study shows that the predictive value of relapse is more associated with minimal residual disease (MRD) results by RT-PCR than that by FISH.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.