No abstract

Background: To develop a new functional magnetic resonance image (fMRI) network inference method, Brain-NET, that utilizes an efficient machine learning algorithm to quantify contributions of various regions of interests (ROIs) in the brain to a specific ROI. Methods: BrainNET is based on extremely randomized trees to estimate network topology from fMRI data and modified to generate an adjacency matrix representing brain network topology, without reliance on arbitrary thresholds. Open-source simulated fMRI data of 50 subjects in 28 different simulations under various confounding conditions with known ground truth were used to validate the method. Performance was compared with correlation and partial correlation (PC). The real-world performance was then evaluated in a publicly available attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) data set, including 134 typically developing children (mean age: 12.03, males: 83), 75 ADHD inattentive (mean age: 11.46, males: 56), and 93 ADHD combined (mean age: 11.86, males: 77) subjects. Network topologies in ADHD were inferred using BrainNET, correlation, and PC. Graph metrics were extracted to determine differences between the ADHD groups. Results: BrainNET demonstrated excellent performance across all simulations and varying confounders in identifying the true presence of connections. In the ADHD data set, BrainNET was able to identify significant changes (p < 0.05) in graph metrics between groups. No significant changes in graph metrics between ADHD groups were identified using correlation and PC. Conclusion: We describe BrainNET, a new network inference method to estimate fMRI connectivity that was adapted from gene regulatory methods. BrainNET out-performed Pearson correlation and PC in fMRI simulation data and real-world ADHD data. BrainNET can be used independently or combined with other existing methods as a useful tool to understand network changes and to determine the true network topology of the brain under various conditions and disease states.

No abstract

In this work, we developed multiple 2D and 3D segmentation models with multiresolution input to segment brain tumor components, and then ensembled them to obtain robust segmentation maps. This reduced overfitting and resulted in a more generalized model. Multiparametric MR images of 335 subjects from BRATS 2019 challenge were used for training the models. Further, we tested a classical machine learning algorithm (xgboost) with features extracted from the segmentation maps to classify subject survival range. Preliminary results on the BRATS 2019 validation dataset demonstrasted this method can achieve excellent performance with DICE scores of 0.898, 0.784, 0.779 for whole tumor, tumor core and enhancing tumor respectively and accuracy 34.5 % for survuval prediction. * -Equal Contribution

Deep learning (DL) models have provided the state-of-the-art performance in a wide variety of medical imaging benchmarking challenges, including the Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) challenges. However, the task of focal pathology multi-compartment segmentation (e.g., tumor and lesion sub-regions) is particularly challenging, and potential errors hinder the translation of DL models into clinical workflows. Quantifying the reliability of DL model predictions in the form of uncertainties, could enable clinical review of the most uncertain regions, thereby building trust and paving the way towards clinical translation. Recently, a number of uncertainty estimation methods have been introduced for DL medical image segmentation tasks. Developing scores to evaluate and compare the performance of uncertainty measures will assist the end-user in making more informed decisions. In this study, we explore and evaluate a score developed during the BraTS 2019-2020 task on uncertainty quantification (QU-BraTS), and designed to assess and rank uncertainty estimates for brain tumor multi-compartment segmentation. This score (1) rewards uncertainty estimates that produce high confidence in correct assertions, and those that assign low confidence levels at incorrect assertions, and (2) penalizes uncertainty measures that lead to a higher percentages of under-confident correct assertions. We further benchmark the segmentation uncertainties generated by 14 independent participating teams of QU-BraTS 2020, all of which also participated in the main BraTS segmentation task. Overall, our findings confirm the importance and complementary value that uncertainty estimates provide to segmentation algorithms, and hence highlight the need for uncertainty quantification in medical image analyses. Our evaluation code is made publicly available at <a href='https://github.com/RagMeh11/QU-BraTS'>https://github.com/RagMeh11/QU-BraTS</a>