This study reports the comparison between two dose calculation algorithms, Acuros XB 13.5 (AXB) and Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm (AAA) against Monte Carlo (MC) simulations for 3D-Conformal Radiation Therapy (3D-CRT) using a female pelvic rando phantom. 3D-CRT treatment plans were generated on the CT images of rando phantom using AXB and AAA with Source to Axis Distance (SAD) technique. Doses obtained using two algorithms and MC results were compared using MATLAB based software CERR. In house MATLAB code was developed to calculate the gamma dose distribution comparison in terms of dose difference (DD) and distance to agreement distribution (DTA). The results showed that the D mean in the PTV TOTAL (PTV) volume for AXB and AAA was equal to the mean dose calculated by MC simulations. The gamma passing rates for AXB were more accurate in comparison to AAA with reference to MC for PTV, Bladder and Femoral Heads region. After analysing the dose comparison specially for the PTV, femoral heads, also the analysis of dose volume histogram (DVH) and gamma dose distribution comparison for PTV, femoral heads and bladder, it can be concluded that AXB is more accurate in comparison to AAA. It can be said that AXB is well suited for dose calculation in clinical setup when compared to MC calculations.

The Chipko Andolan: forest conservation based on people's power describes the origins of the Chipko Andolan movement which has become famous for its work in preventing the destruction of forests in India. The movement began in the Uttarakhand region of the central Himalayas and has been active throughout the 1970s and 1980s. The paper discusses the background to the movement, its development and work with other other community groups in the region.

Purpose:The purpose of the study was to estimate the backscatter electron dose in internal shielding during electron beam therapy using Monte Carlo (MC) simulations and Gafchromic film measurements.Materials and Methods:About 6 and 9 MeV electron beams from a Varian 2100C linac were simulated using BEAMnrc MC code. Various clinical situations of internal shielding were simulated by modeling water phantoms with 2 mm lead sheets placed at different depths. Electron backscatter factors (EBF), a ratio of dose at tissue-shielding interface to the dose at the same point without the shielding, were estimated. The role of 2 mm aluminum in reduction of backscatter was investigated. The measurements were also performed using Gafchromic films and results were compared with MC simulations.Results:For particular beam energy, the EBF value initially increased with depth in the buildup region and then decreased rapidly. The highest value of EBF for both the energies is nearly same though at different depths. Decreased EBF was observed for 9 MeV beam in comparison to the 6 MeV beam for the same depth of shielding placement. Two millimeter aluminum reduced the backscatter by nearly 25% at maximum backscatter condition for both the energies, though the effectiveness slightly decreased at higher energy. The range of backscatter electrons was varying from 5 to 12 mm in the upstream direction from the interface. The Gafchromic film-measured EBF and MC-simulated EBF were matching well within the clinically acceptable limits except in close vicinity of tissue-lead interface.Conclusions:This study provides an important clinical data to design internal shielding at the local clinical setup and confirms applicability of MC simulations in backscatter dose calculations at interfaces where physical measurements are difficult to perform.

No abstract

Objective: This study compares planning techniques stratified by consensus delineation guidelines in patients undergoing whole-breast radiotherapy based on an objective plan quality assessment scale. Methods: 10 patients with left-sided breast cancer were randomly selected, and target delineation for intact breast was performed using Tangent (RTOG 0413), ESTRO, and RTOG guidelines. Consensus Plan Quality Metric (PQM) scoring was defined and communicated to the physicist before commencing treatment planning. Field-in-field IMRT (FiF), inverse IMRT (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were created for each delineation. Statistical analyses utilised a two-way repeated measures analysis of variance, after applying a Bonferroni correction. Results: Total PQM score of plans for Tangent and ESTRO were comparable for FiF and IMRT techniques (FiF vs IMRT for Tangent, p = 0.637; FiF vs IMRT for ESTRO, p = 0.304), and were also significantly higher compared to VMAT. Total PQM score of plans for RTOG revealed that IMRT planning achieved a significantly higher score compared to both FiF and VMAT (IMRT vs FiF, p < 0.001; IMRT vs VMAT, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Total PQM scores were equivalent for FiF and IMRT for both Tangent and ESTRO delineations, whereas IMRT was best suited for RTOG delineation. Advances in knowledge: FiF and IMRT planning techniques are best suited for ESTRO or Tangent delineations. IMRT also yields better results with RTOG delineation.