Highlights Use of a combination of vitamin D, magnesium, and vitamin B 12 (DMB) in patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) was studied. Fewer patients ≥50 y of age with COVID-19 on DMB suffered clinical deterioration. Further studies are warranted to ascertain the full benefit of DMB in patients with COVID-19.
Objective: To determine the clinical outcomes of older COVID-19 patients who received DMB compared to those who did not. We hypothesized that fewer patients administered DMB would require oxygen therapy and/or intensive care support than those who did not. Methodology: Cohort observational study of all consecutive hospitalized COVID-19 patients aged 50 and above in a tertiary academic hospital who received DMB compared to a recent cohort who did not. Patients were administered oral vitamin D3 1000 IU OD, magnesium 150mg OD and vitamin B12 500mcg OD (DMB) upon admission if they did not require oxygen therapy. Primary outcome was deterioration post-DMB administration leading to any form of oxygen therapy and/or intensive care support. Results: Between 15 January and 15 April 2020, 43 consecutive COVID-19 patients aged ≥50 were identified. 17 patients received DMB and 26 patients did not. Baseline demographic characteristics between the two groups was significantly different in age. In univariate analysis, age and hypertension showed significant influence on outcome while DMB retained protective significance after adjusting for age or hypertension separately in multivariate analysis. Fewer DMB patients than controls required initiation of oxygen therapy during their hospitalization (17.6% vs 61.5%, P=0.006). DMB exposure was associated with odds ratios of 0.13 (95% CI: 0.03 − 0.59) and 0.20 (95% CI: 0.04 − 0.93) for oxygen therapy and/or intensive care support on univariate and multivariate analyses respectively. Conclusions: DMB combination in older COVID-19 patients was associated with a significant reduction in proportion of patients with clinical deterioration requiring oxygen support and/or intensive care support. This study supports further larger randomized control trials to ascertain the full benefit of DMB in ameliorating COVID-19 severity.
Introduction A high incidence of mortality and severe COVID‐19 infection was reported in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients during the early phases of the COVID‐19 pandemic; however, outcomes with subsequent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) variants, such as the omicron variant, have yet to be reported. Additionally, rollout of COVID‐19 vaccinations in subsequent pandemic waves may modify COVID‐19 disease severity and mortality in this immunocompromised population. We describe COVID‐19 outcomes among a highly vaccinated population of HSCT recipients at a single center during successive waves of community transmission arising from the SARS‐CoV‐2 delta and omicron variants. Methods We retrospectively reviewed medical records of all HSCT recipients at our institution who tested positive for SARS‐CoV‐2 from May 2021 to May 2022. Descriptive statistics were reported; the chi‐square test was utilized to identify factors associated with 90‐day all‐cause mortality and severity of COVID‐19 infection. Results Over the 1‐year study period, 77 HSCT recipients at our center contracted COVID‐19 (43 allogenic; 34 autologous). Twenty‐six (33.8%) patients were infected with the SARS‐CoV‐2 delta variant, while 51 (66.2%) had the SARS‐CoV‐2 omicron variant. Thirty‐nine (50.6%) patients required hospitalization. More than 80% had received prior COVID‐19 vaccination (57.1% with two doses, 27.3% with three doses). The majority (90.9%) had mild disease; only one (1.3%) patient required mechanical ventilation. Active hematological disease at time of COVID‐19 infection was associated with increased odds of mortality [odds ratio (OR) = 6.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.20–40]. The 90‐day all‐cause mortality was 7.8% (six patients). Infection with the omicron variant (vs. delta) was associated with less severe illness (OR = 0.05, 95% CI = 0.01–0.47) and decreased odds of mortality (OR = 0.08, 95% CI = 0.01–0.76). Being on immunosuppression (OR = 5.10, 95% CI = 1.10–23.60) and being unvaccinated at disease onset (OR = 14.76, 95% CI = 2.89–75.4) were associated with greater severity of COVID‐19 infection. Conclusion We observed favorable outcomes with COVID‐19 infection in a cohort of vaccinated HSCT patients. The SARS‐CoV‐2 omicron variant was associated with both less severe illness and decreased odds of mortality. As COVID‐19 moves toward endemicity, early access to treatment and encouraging vaccination uptake is crucial in mitigating the challenge of COVID‐19 management among HSCT recipients. Surveillance and assessment of clinical outcomes with new SARS‐CoV‐2 variants also remains important in this immunocompromised population.
The role of central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis with high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) in DLBCL is controversial. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the efficacy of prophylactic HDMTX on isolated CNS relapse, concomitant CNS and systemic relapse, systemic relapse, and survival outcomes in 226 patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL and high-risk CNS International Prognostic Index (CNS-IPI) score treated with RCHOP. The three-year risk of isolated CNS relapse was significantly lower in patients who received HDMTX, at 3.1% compared to 14.6% (P = 0.032) in those who did not. However, neither concomitant CNS-systemic relapse rates, systemic relapse rates, nor three-year PFS and OS were significantly different between treatment groups in multivariable analysis. Among propensity score-matched patients (N = 102), HDMTX was also associated with significantly lower isolated CNS relapse rates (HR 0.06, 95% CI 0.004–0.946, P = 0.046). HDMTX was well tolerated with manageable toxicities when given at a dose of 3 g/m2 by day 3 of RCHOP chemotherapy. Using propensity score matching and multivariable regression to yield treatment groups with well-balanced covariates, we showed that prophylactic HDMTX improved isolated CNS relapse rates but did not decrease concomitant CNS-systemic relapse rates, systemic relapse rates, or improve survival outcomes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.