No abstract

Background Lung cancer is a frequent comorbidity of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, the local risk of developing lung cancer related to regional emphysema distribution and clinical outcome has not been investigated. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of regional emphysema score (RES) on tumor location and prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Methods We enrolled 457 patients who underwent curative surgery for NSCLC at seven hospitals at The Catholic University of Korea from 2014 to 2018. Emphysema was visually assessed for each lobe, with the lingula as a separate lobe. Semi-quantitative emphysema scoring was classified as follows: 0 = none, 0.5 = 1 to 10%, 1 = 11 to 25%, 2 = 26 to 50%, 3 = 51 to 75%, and 4 = 76 to 100%. An RES was given to each of the six lung zone: the upper, middle, and lower lobes in the right and left lungs. Results There were 145 patients in the high RES (≥ 3) group and 312 in the low RES (< 3) group. The mean RES in each lobe with cancer was significantly higher than that in other lobes without cancer (0.51 vs. 0.37, P <  0.001). This group showed significantly shorter disease-free survival (P <  0.001), in addition, presence of COPD, low diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (< 80), smoking status, and poor differentiation were more frequent in this group. Also, cancer in a lobe with a higher RES (odds ratio (OR) = 1.56; 95% confidence interval (CI:1.01–2.42; P = 0.04), pathologic stage ≥ III (OR = 2.23; 95% CI: 1.28–3.89; P <  0.001), and poor differentiation (OR = 1.99; 95% CI: 1.22–3.21; P <  0.001) were independent factors for tumor recurrence. Conclusions The regional severity of emphysema by visual qualification was associated with the location of lung cancer, and was an independently poor prognostic factor for tumor recurrence in completely resected NSCLC patients.

Background: The phase III trial IMpower133 showed that platinum and etoposide plus atezolizumab was associated with improved overall survival (OS) and progression free-survival (PFS) when compared to the placebo group in treatment-naïve extensive stage (ES) small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Due to superiority in clinical outcomes, combination immunotherapy plus chemotherapy have become mainstay treatment modalities as first-line treatment in ES-SCLC. Nevertheless, real-world data are still lacking and the search for potential biomarkers is essential. This study aimed to evaluate potential predictive biomarkers applicable in ES-SCLC under combination therapy. Methods: Patients with ES-SCLC under etoposide-platinum-atezolizumab enrolled from seven university hospitals affiliated to the Catholic University of Korea were evaluated. Pretreatment clinical parameters were evaluated for association with OS and PFS. Adverse events (AEs) during induction and maintenance phases were also evaluated. p-values below 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 41 patients were evaluated. Six-month survival was 68.6%. As best response to treatment, 26 (63.4%) showed partial response, nine (22.0%) showed stable disease, and four (9.8%) showed progressive disease. During the induction phase, grade I-II AEs occurred in 22 (53.7%) patients, and grade III-IV AEs occurred in 26 (63.4%) patients. During the maintenance phase, nine out of 25 (36.0%) patients experienced any grade AEs. In multivariate analysis for OS, lactate dehydrogenase

In patients with completely resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy has been associated with improvement in survival by minimizing the risk of recurrence. For years, systemic chemotherapy including platinum based regimen has been a mainstay treatment modality of adjuvant treatment after complete resection. ADAURA study showed that among completely resected IB to IIIA NSCLC, disease-free survival was significantly better in patients under adjuvant osimertinib than a placebo group. After the advent of a variety of new treatment regimens, such as third generation TKI and immunotherapy, the landscape of postoperative adjuvant treatment has been changing. In this review, we discuss some key issues regarding choice of adjuvant treatment after complete resection in NSCLC, and provide further updates on recent advances in treatment modalities.