Author Contributions: Drs Jiang and Han had full access to all data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

No abstract

The development of novel anti-HER2 drugs opens new treatment options for women with breast cancers, including lower expression of HER2. The epidemiology and clinical outcome of metastatic HER2-low breast cancer remain not well described. We designed a retrospective cohort study of the 2010–2017 National Cancer Database (NCDB) was designed to compare the overall survival of HER2-low and HER2-zero de novo metastatic breast cancer with systemic therapy. Multivariable Cox regression models were performed to estimate hazard ratios (HR), adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical factors. A total of 20,636 of 30,929 (66.7%) patients were HER2-low and 10,293 (33.3%) were HER2-zero. When stratified by hormonal receptor status, HER2-low tumors account for 18,066 (69.7%) cases in HR+/HER2− population and 2570 (51.4%) cases in HR−/HER2− population. The prevalence of HER2-low tumors was similar across racial groups with a slightly lower prevalence among the Hispanic population. Women with HER2-low tumors had longer overall survival (OS) than women with Her2-zero tumors in both HR-positive (median OS 39.0 months vs. 37.1 months; adjusted HR: 0.95, 95%CI (0.91–0.98)) and HR-negative groups (median OS 15.8 months vs. 14.1 months; adjusted HR: 0.92 95%CI (0.86–0.98)). The survival advantage was primarily observed in patients who received chemotherapy as their first line of treatment (HR 0.92 95%CI (0.88–0.96) vs. 0.99 95%CI (0.94–1.04), p-interaction = 0.04). In summary, HER2-low tumors, irrespective of hormone receptor status, have better survival than HER2-zero tumors in the de-novo metastatic setting. The survival advantage was primarily observed in patients who received chemotherapy in the first line.

No abstract

Aim:We investigated the association between systemic sclerosis (SSc) and perioperative cardiovascular risk for inpatient non-cardiac surgical procedures. Methods:We used data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) for the year 2014 to identify patients undergoing inpatient non-cardiac surgery. SSc and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were defined by International Classification of Diseases 9th Revision diagnosis codes. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. We adjusted for demographic information, socioeconomic status, cardiac comorbidities, cardiovascular risk factors and procedural category. Two models were used with different categorization strategies for surgical procedures.Results: A total of 8 156 379 hospitalizations for non-cardiac surgeries were included, 4385 of which had a diagnosis of SSc. Patients with SSc were older, more likely to be female and Caucasian and with higher cardiac and systemic comorbidity burden. In univariate analysis, SSc was associated with higher risk of perioperative MACE (odds ratio [OR] = 2.9; P < 0.001) and all-cause death (P = 3.07; P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis yielded conflicting results regarding the association betweenSSc and perioperative MACE (Model 1: OR = 1.42; P = 0.146; Model 2: OR = 1.59; P = 0.048). Subsequent analysis showed that only perioperative myocardial infarction (Model 1 OR = 1.85; P = 0.048; Model 2 OR = 1.94; P = 0.031) was independently associated with SSc.