By using various skill scores and spatial characteristics of spatial verification methods and traditional techniques of the model evaluation tool, the gridded precipitation observation, known as Climate Prediction Center Morphing Technique, gauge observation and three datasets that were derived from local, Shanghai, and Grapes models, respectively, were conducted to assess the 3 lead day rainfall forecast with 0.5 day intervals during the summer of 2020 over Central East China. Results have shown that the local model generally outperforms the other two for the most skill scores but usually with relatively larger uncertainties than the Shanghai model, and it has the least displacement errors for moderate rainfall among the three datasets. However, the rainfall of the Grapes model has been heavily underestimated and is accompanied with a large displacement error. Both the local and Shanghai model can effectively forecast the large-scale convection and rainstorms but over forecast the local convection, while the local model likely over forecasts the local rainstorms. In addition, the Shanghai model slightly favors over forecasting on a broad scale range and a broad threshold range, and the local model slightly misses the rainfall exceeding 100 mm. Generally, for a broadly comparative evaluation on rainfall, the popular dichotomous methods should be recommended when considering reasonable classification of thresholds if the accuracy is highly demanding. In addition, most spatial methods are suggested to conduct with proper pre-handling of non-rainfall event cases. Especially, the verification metrics including spatial characteristic difference information should be recommended to emphasize rewarding the severe events forecast under a global warming background.

No abstract