In this study, a comparative study of carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) bar and steel–carbon fiber composite bar (SCFCB) reinforced coral concrete beams was made through a series of experimental tests and theoretical analyses. The flexural capacity, crack development and failure modes of CFRP and SCFCB-reinforced coral concrete were investigated in detail. They were also compared to ordinary steel-reinforced coral concrete beams. The results show that under the same conditions of reinforcement ratios, the SCFCB-reinforced beams exhibit better performance than CFRP-reinforced beams, and stiffness is slightly lower than that of steel-reinforced beams. Under the same load conditions, the crack width of SCFCB beams was between that of steel-reinforced beams and CFRP bar-reinforced beams. Before the steel core yields, the crack growth rate of SCFCB beam is similar to the steel-reinforced beams. SCFCB has a higher strength utilization rate—about 70–85% of its ultimate strength. Current design guidance was also examined based on the test results. It was found that the existing design specifications for FRP-reinforced normal concrete is not suitable for SCFCB-reinforced coral concrete structures.

Steel‐fiber composite bar (SFCB) is a new technique with steel core embedded into the fiber‐reinforced polymer (FRP) bars, which solve the shortcomings of poor ductility and low stiffness of FRP‐reinforced concrete members. Based on the experimental study, flexural behavior of a new type concrete, SFCB bars‐reinforced coral concrete beams, is investigated. The deflection, failure mode, tensile strain, and ultimate flexural capacity of this new type of concrete beam are studied in detail through a series four‐points bending tests. The results show that the failure process of SFCB‐reinforced coral concrete beam can be divided into three main stages: elastic, cracking, and failure. Because exterior layer of SFCB bar is able to continue to withstand tensile stress after its steel core yield, hence, the flexural rigidity and flexural capacity of the beams both increase. The flexural stiffness of SFCB bars‐reinforced coral concrete beams is also increased, and the load‐deflection relation is more or less nonlinear. By using SFCB bars, the stiffness of the beams can be increased by about 20%. However, under high stress state, the relative slip between the carbon fiber and the concrete as well as that between the steel core and the carbon fiber cause tensile stress loss which weakened the flexural resistance of the SFCB bar‐reinforced coral concrete beam. The bonding performance between the round surface steel core and the carbon fiber is obviously weaker than that of the threaded surface steel core, and the steel core slip is more likely to occur under the higher tensile stress. When Using ACI440.1R‐15 and GB50608‐2010 to calculate the flexural capacity of the SFCB beams, the ratios of the theoretical value and the measured value from tests are 1.07 and 1.12, respectively. By introducing two new factors k1 and k2, a formula was developed through modification of the existing ones from ACI440.1R‐15 and GB50608‐2010 to calculate the ultimate flexural capacity of SFCB bar reinforced concrete beam which agrees as high as 93–99% with the experimental results.