No abstract

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a rare and devastating chronic lung disease of unknown etiology. Despite the approved treatment options nintedanib and pirfenidone, the medical need for a safe and well-tolerated antifibrotic treatment of IPF remains high. The human prostaglandin F receptor (hFP-R) is widely expressed in the lung tissue and constitutes an attractive target for the treatment of fibrotic lung diseases. Herein, we present our research toward novel quinoline-based hFP-R antagonists, including synthesis and detailed structure–activity relationship (SAR). Starting from a high-throughput screening (HTS) hit of our corporate compound library, multiple parameter improvementsincluding increase of the relative oral bioavailability F rel from 3 to ≥100%led to a highly potent and selective hFP-R antagonist with complete oral absorption from suspension. BAY-6672 (46) representsto the best of our knowledgethe first reported FP-R antagonist to demonstrate in vivo efficacy in a preclinical animal model of lung fibrosis, thus paving the way for a new treatment option in IPF.

Arginine vasopressin (AVP) is increased in patients with heart failure (HF). Its actions are linked to free water reabsorption (V2-) and arteriolar vasoconstriction (V1a receptor). AVP can exacerbate the cardiorenal syndrome with excess fluid retention and afterload increase. Tolvaptan (TOL; selective V2 antagonist) and Conivaptan (CON; dual V1a/V2 antagonist) are two AVP antagonists that counteract the action of AVP with distinct profiles. We investigated the therapeutic effects of CON and TOL in an acute HF model. Mongrel dogs were paced continuously at 220 beats/min. After 14 days, the animals underwent acute testing. Dogs were instrumented to measure cardiac output, blood pressure, pulmonary artery pressure, and left ventricular dP/dtmax. Additionally, during the acute experiments, vasopressin was infused intravenously (4 mU/kg/min) to achieve constant and controlled pathophysiological levels of AVP. Subsequently, animals received either CON or TOL (n = 6; 0.1-mg/kg bolus). There were no significant differences in effect on mean arterial pressure, dP/dtmax, central venous pressure, and urine output between CON and TOL. In contrast, cardiac output increased by 0.15 l/min after CON and decreased by 0.6 l/min after TOL (P < 0.01). Accordingly, the total peripheral resistance increased after TOL by 250 dyn*s/cm and decreased after CON by 125 dyn*s/cm (P < 0.01). In conclusion, it was demonstrated that in an acute HF model, CON lowered, whereas TOL increased afterload. The results suggest that dual V1a/V2 blockade in the acute HF setting could be beneficial compared with selective V2 blockade. Chronic experiments are needed to determine whether this finding can translate into a sustained clinical advantage.

No abstract