Study Design Retrospective. Objectives To report and compare the application of robotic-assisted navigation with an O-arm or three-dimensional (3D) C-arm-assisted pedicle screw insertion in scoliosis surgery, and compare with free-hand technique. Methods One hundred and forty-four scoliosis patients were included in this study. Ninety-two patients underwent robotic-assisted pedicle screw insertion (Group A), and 52 patients underwent freehand fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw insertion (Group B). Group A was further divided into Subgroup AI (n = 48; robotic-assisted navigation with an O-arm) and Subgroup AII (n = 44; robotic-assisted navigation with a 3D C-arm). The evaluated clinical outcomes were operation time, blood loss, radiation exposure, postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative complications. The clinical outcomes, coronal and sagittal scoliosis parameters and the accuracy of the pedicle screw placement were assessed. Results There were no significant differences in blood loss and postoperative hospital stay between Groups A and B ( P = .406, P = .138, respectively). Radiation exposure for patients in Group A (Subgroups AI or AII) was higher than that in Group B ( P < .005), and Subgroup AI had higher patient radiation exposure compared with Subgroup AII ( P < .005). The operation time in Subgroup AII was significantly longer than that in Subgroup AI and Group B ( P = .016, P = .032, respectively). The proportion of clinically acceptable screws was higher in Group A (Subgroups AI or AII) compared with Group B ( P < .005). Conclusions Robotic-assisted navigation with an O-arm or 3D C-arm effectively increased the accuracy and safety in scoliosis surgery. Compared with robotic-assisted navigation with a 3D C-arm, robotic-assisted navigation with an O-arm was more efficient intraoperatively.

Objective To investigate the differences, correlations, and clinical significance of the paraspinal muscles among patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis (IS), degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS), and age-matched healthy subjects. Methods This study involved 159 age-matched patients with L4 anterior spondylolisthesis. The patients were divided into the IS group (n = 81) and DLS group (n = 78). Eighty-four age-matched healthy adults were enrolled as the control group. The cross-sectional area (CSA) of paraspinal muscles (multifidus [MF], erector spinae [ES], and psoas [PS]) and the relative CSA of the paraspinal muscles (paraspinal muscle CSA/vertebral CSA) were measured in the IS group, DLS group, and control group. The degree of fat infiltration was simultaneously observed. Results There was no significant difference in age or sex among the three groups. The relative CSA of the MF and PS was higher in control group than in IS and DLS groups (p < 0.05). The relative CSA of ES was higher in IS and control groups than in DLS group (p < 0.05). The relative CSA of total paraspinal muscles decreased in the order of control group > IS group > DLS group (p < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that the relative CSA of MF, and the degree of fat infiltration of ES were independent protective factors for IS (odds ratio < 1, p < 0.05). The relative CSA of MF was an independent protective factor for DLS (odds ratio < 1, p < 0.05), whereas BMI and the degree of fat infiltration of MF were independent risk factor for DLS (odds ratio > 1, p < 0.05). Conclusion Compared with the control group, patients with IS and DLS showed varying degrees of degeneration, and the degree of degeneration in patients with DLS was more severe at the same age. Lower fat infiltration and higher paraspinal muscle CSA are protective factors for IS and DLS, whereas the higher BMI is risk factor for DLS.