No abstract

Background At present, many protocols for Systematic Reviews (SR) of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have been registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). This study aimed to analyze the innovativeness and rigorousness of the SR protocols and make recommendations for the design and implementation of future SRs on TCM for COVID-19. This effort is likely to enhance the value of the produced information and prevent the futility of the research. Methods PROSPERO was searched comprehensively for identifying SRs of TCM for COVID-19 from the inception of the database to August 2020. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted the data, and cross-checked the retrieved information for consistency. The following details were recorded: database, registration time, organizations, types of research included, participants, interventions, and outcome indicators. All extracted data were analyzed by an overview. The “P - participants, I - interventions, C - controls, and O - outcomes (PICO)” included in the protocols were compared for similarity. The outcomes of the included SR protocols were compared with the newly published Core Outcome Sets (COSs). Results Eighty protocols of SR related to TCM for COVID-19 were obtained after a primary search; finally, 71 protocols were included. The majority of the protocols were from China. Thirty-two organizations participated in the protocol registrations, including 11 hospitals and 21 universities/colleges. However, some protocols were not innovative or rigorous enough. Such as, the PICO of some protocols were similar. The searched literature was incomprehensive, and PICO was not specific and correct. In addition, outcome indicators—arterial oxygen partial pressure, a fraction of inspired oxygen, respiratory failure, and WHO Clinical Progression Scale—in the newly published COSs were infrequently used and often neglected. Conclusions Registering and implementing an innovative and rigorous SR ensures the usefulness of the produced information and avoids the duplication of research and the wastage of resources. It is important to focus on and solve the methodological problems, such as non-specific PICO, incomprehensive literature retrieval, COS application, and incorrect indicator name, in future SR protocols.

BackgroundStroke is the second leading cause of death worldwide, and improving sleep quality in post-stroke insomnia is beneficial to the recovery of stroke. Acupuncture is widely used for the treatment of post-stroke insomnia in China. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to explore the efficacy and safety of acupuncture for post-stroke insomnia.MethodsEight databases were searched from their inception to 12 September 2022. Two reviewers independently performed the study screening and data extraction. The outcomes include Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), objective sleep data measured by polysomnography (PSG), long-term efficacy and adverse events. The quality of the trials was assessed by the Cochrane risk of bias tool 2.0. The RevMan 5.4 and Stata 15.1 were used for data synthesis.ResultsAmong 3,233 participants from 41 studies were included. Pooled results indicated that acupuncture was superior to control group (CG) in improving PSQI total score (standardized mean difference (SMD) = −1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI): −1.32, −0.74, P < 0.00001), increasing sleep efficiency (SMD = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.37 to 0.92) and total sleep time (SMD = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.22 to 0.86). The favorable results in improving PSQI total score (SMD = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.37 to 0.92), reduced sleep latency (SMD = 1.84, 95% CI: 0.31 to 3.38) and increased total sleep time (SMD = −0.73, 95% CI: −1.15 to −0.31) were also observed in comparisons of acupuncture plus CG vs. CG. As of long-term efficacy and safety, the effects of acupuncture were long-term and robustness, however, due to limited safety information, reliable safety conclusions cannot be drawn. Subgroup analysis showed that acupuncture plus CG was superior to CG for post-infarction patients, but the efficacy of acupuncture alone compared to non-BZDs or other hypnotics needs further research. The GRADE assessment demonstrated that the level of evidence was mostly low or very low given the flaws in the study design and considerable heterogeneity among the included studies.ConclusionAcupuncture could improve sleep quality, has long-term efficacy and without serious adverse events. However, the findings should be treated with caution owing to the existence of methodological quality issues. More studies with rigorous designs are warranted for validation and explored the safety of acupuncture.