Background. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second most common liver malignancy after hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), with a dismal prognosis and high heterogeneity. The oncological advantages of anatomical resection (AR) and nonanatomical resection (NAR) in HCC have been studied, but surgical strategies for ICC remain controversial with insufficient investigations. Materials and Methods. From Jan 2013 to Dec 2016, 3880 consecutive patients were retrospectively reviewed from a single center. Patients with ICC undergoing AR or NAR have been enrolled according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed between two groups with a 1 : 1 ratio. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints included disease-free survival (DFS), intraoperative patterns, postoperative morbidity, mortality, complications and recurrence. A prognostic nomogram was developed by a multivariate Cox proportion hazard model. Results. After PSM, 99 paired cases were selected from 276 patients enrolled in this study. Patients in the AR group achieved better 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS (70%, 46%, and 34%, respectively) and DFS (61%, 21%, and 10%, respectively) than patients in the NAR group with statistical significance after PSM analysis. The postoperative complications and recurrence patterns were comparable between the two groups. Multivariate analysis identified NAR, tumor size >5 cm, multiple tumors, and poor differentiation as independent risk factors for OS ( p < 0.05 ). Selected patients can benefit most from AR, according to subgroup analysis. A prognostic nomogram based on six independent risk factors for OS and factors with clinical significance was constructed to predict OS in ICC patients. Conclusion. AR improved the long-term survival of ICC with comparable postoperative complications and similar recurrence patterns. AR is suggested in ICC patients with sufficient remnant liver volume. In addition to surgery strategy, malignant characteristics of tumors are risk factors for ICC prognosis.

Background FOXO3a (previously termed FKHRL1), plays an evolutionarily conserved role in the control of biological process, including DNA damage, apoptosis, and cell cycle regulation. However, the role of FOXO3a in tumors remains controversial. This meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the prognostic value of FOXO3a expression in patients with solid tumors. Methods A systematic literature search of the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed. Eligible publications on FOXO3a and cancer prognosis were collected and screened according to the eligibility criteria. The combined odds ratios (ORs) or hazard ratios (HRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the prognostic value of FOXO3a. Stata 12.0 software was used for statistical analysis. Results A total of 4058 patients from 21 articles on a variety of solid tumors were included. Meta-analysis showed that the increased FOXO3a expression level was associated with longer overall survival (HR = 0.62; 95% CI: 0.46–0.85). The pooled ORs indicated high expression level of FOXO3a in tumors was significantly associated with lymph node metastasis (OR = 0.46; 95% CI: 0.30–0.71), TNM stage (OR = 0.37; 95% CI: 0.25–0.54), tumor differentiation (OR = 0.46; 95% CI: 0.26–0.80), distant metastasis (OR = 0.44; 95% CI: 0.32–0.61), and age (OR = 1.28; 95% CI: 1.08–1.51). However, we did not observe a significant correlation between the high expression of FOXO3a and sex or tumor size. Conclusions The high expression level of FOXO3a was associated with better clinical outcomes in solid tumors. FOXO3a may therefore serve as a potential prognostic biomarker and a promising molecular target.

No abstract

Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a rare hematological malignancy bearing of both myelodysplastic syndrome and myeloproliferative neoplasm characteristics. Despite the low incidence, the clinical diagnosis of CMML was difficult and the survival was poor. The optimal first-line therapy for CMML still remains a matter of debate. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical characteristics of 66 CMML patients in a single center during the past 10 years and studied the survival status of CMML patients in the real world and the influence of treatment methods on the prognosis of patients. Results: For the 66 CMML patients, the median age was 60 years old (IQR 47.0-67.0), and an approximately 1.6:1.0 male-to-female ratio was found. CMML-0, CMML-1 and CMML-2 accounted for 13.7% (9/66), 43.9% (29/66) and 42.4% (28/66), respectively. The chromosome abnormality rate was 27.2% (18/66). Gene mutation was detected in 60 patients by sequenced in first-generation with 51.1% (22/43) gene mutations and in NGS with 82.3% (14/17) gene mutations. The top three mutation genes were ASXL1 MT (11/60, 18.3%), TET2 MT (10/60, 16.7%), and SRSF2 MT (9/60, 15.0%). There were 27 patients in supportive therapy group, and 39 patients in chemotherapy group including patients undergoing HSCT. Patients in chemotherapy group showed better OS than those in the supportive group before and after PSM analysis with p < 0.05. Patients with blast cell in bone marrow ≥10% or WHO CMML-2 benefited more from chemotherapy treatment achieving better OS. Multivariate analysis showed that supportive therapy and intermediate-2/high in CPSS were independent risk factors for OS after PSM. Discussion: Chemotherapy including hypomethylating agents prolonged overall survival of CMML patients, especially in patients with blast cell ≥10% in bone marrow or WHO CMML-2 comparing with supportive therapy. Sequencing may provide direct insight into the molecular mechanism by detection of gene mutation, enabling personalized treatment in the future.