Background and purposeLight transmission aggregometry (LTA) and CYP2C19 genotype analysis are commonly used to evaluate the antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel during the interventional treatment of intracranial aneurysms. The aim of this study was to determine which test can predict ischaemic events during these treatments.MethodsPatient demographic information, imaging data, laboratory data and ischaemic complications were recorded. LTA and CYP2C19 genotype results were compared, and multiple linear regression was performed to examine factors related to platelet reactivity. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to determine whether LTA and CYP2C19 could predict ischaemic complications and to identify other clinical risk factors. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was conducted to calculate the cut-off value for predicting ischaemic complications. A subgroup analysis was also performed for different CYP2C19 genotype metabolisers, as well as for patients with flow diverters and traditional stents.ResultsA total of 379 patients were included, of which 22 developed ischaemic events. Maximum platelet aggregation induced by ADP (ADP-MPA) could predict ischaemic events (p<0.001; area under the curve, 0.752 (95% CI 0.663 to 0.842)), and its cut-off value was 41.5%. ADP-MPA (p=0.001) and hypertension duration >10 years (p=0.022) were independent risk factors for ischaemic events, while the CYP2C19 genotype was not associated with ischaemic events. In the subgroup analysis, ADP-MPA could predict ischaemic events in fast metabolisers (p=0.004) and intermediate metabolisers (p=0.003). The cut-off value for ischaemic events was lower in patients with flow diverters (ADP-MPA=36.4%) than in patients with traditional stents (ADP-MPA=42.9%).ConclusionsADP-MPA can predict ischaemic complications during endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Patients with flow diverters require stronger antiplatelet medication than patients with traditional stents.

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to compare complications and outcomes between intracranial aneurysms treated with the Pipeline embolisation device (PED) alone or with PED combined with coiling for different-sized aneurysms.MethodPatients with aneurysms treated by PED were collected from the PED in China postmarket multicentre registry study. We performed a propensity match analysis to compare the efficacy and safety between PED alone and PED combined with coiling treatment, and then aneurysms were organised into three groups based on their size: small (≤7 mm), medium (≤15 mm to >7 mm) and large/giant (>15 mm). Complications and aneurysm occlusion rates in the aneurysm size groups were compared between PED alone and PED combined with coiling patients.ResultA total of 1171 patients with 1322 aneurysms were included. All patients received clinical follow-up, while angiographic follow-up was available in 967 aneurysms. For small aneurysms, there was no difference in the aneurysm occlusion rate between two groups (79.1% vs 88.4%, respectively), while there was a significant increase in the ischaemic complication rate (8.3% vs 19.3%, respectively, p=0.0001). For medium and large/giant saccular aneurysms, PED combined with coiling significantly improved the occlusion rate (medium aneurysms: 74.7% vs 88.8%, respectively, p<0.0001; large/giant saccular aneurysms: 72.9% vs 86.9%, respectively, p=0.018), while there were no differences in the total complication rate. For large/giant non-saccular aneurysms, two groups showed no differences.ConclusionUse of the PED with adjunctive coils can significantly improve the occlusion rate of medium aneurysms, without increasing the total complication rate.

BackgroundStent assisted coiling (SAC) and flow diverters (FDs) are common endovascular treatments for wide necked cerebral aneurysms, but studies comparing the new generation Atlas SAC and FDs are scarce. We performed a propensity score matched (PSM) cohort study to compare the Atlas SAC and the pipeline embolization device (PED) for proximal internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysms.MethodsConsecutive ICA aneurysms treated at our institution with either the Atlas SAC or PED were studied. PSM was used to control for age, sex, smoking, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia, and the rupture status, maximal diameter, and neck size of the aneurysm (aneurysms >15 mm and non-saccular aneurysms were excluded). Midterm outcomes and hospital costs were compared between these two devices.ResultsA total of 309 patients with 316 ICA aneurysms were included. Following PSM, 178 aneurysms treated with the Atlas SAC and PED were matched (n=89 in each group). Aneurysms treated with the Atlas SAC required a slightly longer procedure time, but had lower hospital costs than those treated with the PED (115.2±24.6 vs 102.4±40.8 min, P=0.012; $27 650.2±$6961.4 vs $34 107.0±$3707.2, P<0.001). Atlas SAC and PED treatments showed equivalent aneurysm occlusion rates (89.9% vs 86.5%, P=0.486), complication rates (5.6% vs 11.2%, P=0.177), and a favorable functional outcome (96.6% vs 97.8%, P=1.0) at follow-up (8.2±3.0 vs 8.4±4.2 months, P=0.652).ConclusionIn this PSM study, midterm outcomes of the PED and Atlas SAC in the treatment of ICA aneurysms were similar. However, SAC required a longer operation time, and the PED may increase the economic cost of inpatients in Beijing, China.