BackgroundLong intergenic non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are a class of non-coding RNAs that are involved in gene expression regulation. Taurine up-regulated gene 1 (TUG1) is a cancer progression related lncRNA in some tumor oncogenesis; however, its role in colorectal cancer (CRC) remains unclear. In this study, we determined the expression patterns of TUG1 in CRC patients and explored its effect on CRC cell metastasis using cultured representative CRC cell lines.MethodsThe expression levels of TUG1 in 120 CRC patients and CRC cells were determined using quantitative real-time PCR. HDACs and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-related gene expression were determined using western blot. CRC cell metastasis was assessed by colony formation, migration assay and invasion assay.ResultsOur data showed that the levels of TUG1 were upregulated in both CRC cell lines and primary CRC clinical samples. TUG1 upregulation was closely correlated with the survival time of CRC patients. Overexpression of TUG1 in CRC cells increased their colony formation, migration, and invasion invitro and promoted their metastatic potential in vivo, whereas knockdown of TUG1 inhibited the colony formation, migration, and invasion of CRC cells invitro. It is also worth pointing out that TUG1 activated EMT-related gene expression.ConclusionOur data suggest that tumor expression of lncRNA TUG1 plays a critical role in CRC metastasis. TUG1 may have potential roles as a biomarker and/or a therapeutic target in colorectal cancer.
e16084 Background: Recently, immunotherapy combined with trastuzumab and chemotherapy have been recommended by the clinical guidelines of many countries as the first-line treatment for advanced HER2-positive G/GEJ adenocarcinoma. Combining chemotherapy with tislelizumab and trastuzumab in the neoadjuvant/adjuvant setting may benefit patients with locally advanced, resectable HER2-positive GC/GEJC. Methods: This study is a multicenter, single-arm, open-label phase 2 study (NCT04819971). Patients with histologically confirmed cT2-4NxM0 or cTxN+M0, (TNM 8th edition), resectable gastric adenocarcinoma are eligible for this study. Neoadjuvant therapy will be administered for four cycles. The patients will receive tislelizumab and trastuzumab for 1 cycle (Q3W), followed by tislelizumab and trastuzumab combined with DOS (Docetaxel + Oxaliplatin + S-1) for 3 cycles (Q3W). Surgery is planned 4-6 weeks after preoperative treatment. Patients who have complete surgical resection will receive adjuvant therapy starting within 4–6 weeks after surgery for 6 cycles (three cycles of tislelizumab and trastuzumab combined with DOS regimen, followed by 6 weeks of tislelizumab and trastuzumab for 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was pathological complete response rate (pCR). Secondary endpoints included R0 resection rate, 1-year and 2-year event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. Results: From September 13, 2021 to February 01, 2023, 12 patients were enrolled (58.0% male, median age 61 years old), and the median follow up time was 7.3 months (0.4-16.9). Seven patients completed surgery, and 5 patients were undergoing neoadjuvant therapy. The R0 resection rate was 100%, 3 patients (42.9%) achieved pCR, and 4 patients (57.1%) achieved major pathological remission (MPR). Postoperative pathology showed tumor downstaging in 5 cases after neoadjuvant therapy, with a decrease rate of 71.4%. Median OS and EFS have not been reached. The most common AEs (all grades, grade ≥3) were anemia in 1 (8.3%) and neutropenia in 1 case (8.3%). The immune-related adverse events were all grade 1 included 2 thyroid dysfunction (16.7%), 1 abnormal liver function (8.3%), and 1 of elevated blood sugar (8.3%). No grade 3 or higher immune-related AE was observed. No treatment related deaths were reported. Conclusions: According to the preliminary results, tislelizumab combined with trastuzumab and standard chemotherapy in the perioperative period of HER2-positive GC and EGJ have a good clinical benefit trend and controllable security. Clinical trial information: NCT04819971 .
The majority of colon lesions are <10 mm in size and are easily resected by endoscopists with appropriate basic training. Lesions ≥10 mm in size are difficult to remove technically and are associated with higher rates of incomplete resection. Currently, the main endoscopic approaches include endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for lesions without submucosal invasion, and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for relatively larger lesions involving the superficial submucosal layer. Both of these approaches have limitations, EMR cannot reliably ensure complete resection for larger tumors and recurrence is a key limitation. ESD reliably provides complete resection and an accurate pathological diagnosis but is associated with risk such as perforation or bleeding. In addition, both EMR and ESD may be ineffective in treating subepithelial lesions that extend beyond the submucosa. Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) is an emerging innovative endoscopic therapy which was developed to overcome the limitations of EMR and ESD. Advantages include enabling a transmural resection, complete resection of complex colorectal lesions involving the mucosa to the muscularis propria. Recent studies comparing EFTR with current resection techniques and radical surgery for relatively complicated and larger lesion have provided promising results. If the current trajectory of research and development is maintained, EFTR will likely to become a strong contender as an alternative standard of care for advanced colonic lesions. In the current study we aimed to address this need, and highlighted the areas of future research, while stressing the need for multinational collaboration provide the steppingstone(s) needed to bring EFTR to the mainstream.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.