Background: To investigate the correlation between tortuosity of extracranial internal carotid artery (EICA) and intraprocedural complications in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS). Methods: The study included 244 EICA in 223 patients undergoing CAS. Tortuosity in EICA was measured by the tortuosity index (TI). Multivariate logistic regression was performed to assess the independent risk factors of vasospasm during CAS. Receiver operating characteristic curve was performed to identify the cut-off of TI to predict vasospasm. Results: During the 244 CAS, 71 EICA presented vasospasm and 114 CAS presented hypotension. High TI, long procedural duration and female are independent risk factors for vasospasm during CAS. TI of 118 was the optimal cut-off to predict vasospasm during CAS (sensitivity: 85.9%, specificity: 78.6%). Linear regression analysis demonstrated that TI is positively correlated with procedural duration (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in TI between the hypotension and non-hypotension groups (p = 0.145). Conclusion: TI is an independent risk factor for vasospasm during CAS and a TI ≥118 has the high sensitivity and specificity to predict vasospasm. Our results indicate the value of assessing tortuosity of EICA prior to choosing or performing the procedure in patients with carotid stenosis or occlusion.

No abstract

No abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of early versus delayed carotid artery stenting (CAS) for symptomatic cerebral watershed infarction (sCWI) patients due to stenosis of the proximal internal carotid artery. We retrospectively collected clinical data of those who underwent early or delayed CAS from March 2011 to April 2014. The time of early CAS and delayed CAS was within a week of symptom onset and after four weeks from symptom onset. Clinical data such as second stroke, the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NHISS) score, and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score and periprocedural complications were collected. The rate of second stroke in early CAS group is lower when compared to that of delayed CAS group. There was no significant difference regarding periprocedural complications in both groups. There was a significant difference regarding mean NHISS score 90 days after CAS in two groups. Early CAS group had a significant better good outcome (mRS score ≤ 2) than delayed CAS group. We suggest early CAS for sCWI due to severe proximal internal carotid artery stenosis as it provides lower rate of second stroke, comparable periprocedural complications, and better functional outcomes compared to that of delayed CAS.

Background: Whether endovascular treatment (EVT) is safe and effective for vertebrobasilar artery occlusion (VBAO) is yet incompletely understood. Two RCTs, the endovascular treatment versus standard medical treatment for vertebrobasilar artery occlusion (BEST) trail and the Basilar Artery International Cooperation Study (BASICS), concentrating on this field were recently reported. Objective: We use real-world registry data of VBAO to compare the outcome of EVT inside and outside the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the BEST and BASICS study to testify the feasibility of the selection paradigms of VBAO in these trials. Methods: Consecutive patients with VBAO receiving EVT involving 21 stroke centers were retrospectively included. The safety outcomes [3-month mortality, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and effectiveness outcomes (the proportion of 3-month functional independence (mRS of 0–2) and favorable outcome (mRS of 0–3)] were compared between VBAO patients who meet or failed to meet the BEST/BASICS selection criteria for EVT. Results: Our study cohort consisted of 577 VBAO patients who underwent EVT. Of them, 446 patients had pc-ASPECTS ≧8. Successful reperfusion (mTICI 2b or 3) was achieved in 85.4% ( n = 493). There were 418 patients fulfilling the BEST criterion for EVT and 194 fulfilling the BASICS criterion. Regression analysis indicated that adherence to BEST or BASICS criterion for EVT was not independently related to most of the safety and effectiveness outcome except that adherence to BEST was significantly associated with the 3-month favorable outcome (ORBEST: 1.742, 95% CI: 1.087–2.790). However, when we put pc-ASPECTS into both criteria with a cut-off value of 8, meeting both BEST criterion plus pc-ASPECTS and BASICS criterion plus pc-ASPECTS was independently related to 3-month functional independence (ORBEST: 1.687, 95% CI: 1.077–2.644; ORBASIC: 1.653, 95% CI: 1.038–2.631) and favorable outcome (ORBEST: 2.280, 95% CI: 1.484–3.502; ORBASIC: 2.153, 95% CI: 1.372–3.378). Conclusion: Our study indicated that, based on real-world data of EVT, adherence to BEST or BASICS criterion for EVT was not independently associated with the safety and effectiveness outcome except that adherence to BEST was significantly related to the 3-month favorable outcome. However, the BEST or BASICS selection criterion and pc-ASPECTS ≧8 might be better paradigms for EVT patient selection.