ERAS did not increase 30-day complications compared with CRAS after RC. ERAS may be better than CRAS in terms of bowel movement, tolerance of fluid and regular diet, and ambulation.
Background: This study aimed to investigate the function of circular RNA SMARCA5 (circ-SMARCA5) on cell proliferation, apoptosis, migration and invasion in bladder cancer. Methods: Ten pairs of human bladder cancer tissue and adjacent tissue, five human bladder cancer cell lines (including TCCSUP, 5637, J82, UM-UC-3 and T-24) and normal human urothelial cell line SV-HUC-1, were obtained for the detection of circ-SMARCA5. Control overexpression and ShRNA, circ-SMARCA5 overexpression and ShRNA were constructed and transfected into UM-UC-3 cells as Control(+), Control(−), Circ-SMARCA5(+) and Circ-SMARCA5(−) groups. The role of circ-SMARCA5 was investigated in terms of cellular proliferation, apoptosis, migration, and invasion. Results: Circ-SMARCA5 was overexpressed in tumor tissue compared to paired adjacent tissue and it was also overexpressed in TCCSUP, 5637, J82 and UM-UC-3 cells compared to normal human urothelial cell line SV-HUC-1. In UM-UC-3 cells, cell proliferation ability, migration rate and invasion cell count were increased in Circ-SMARCA5(+) group compared to Control(+) group, while reduced in Circ-SMARCA5(−) group compared to Control(−) group. Regarding the cell apoptosis, apoptosis rate and apoptotic protein C-Caspase 3 expression were decreased in Circ-SMARCA5(+) group than those in Control(+) group but raised in Circ-SMARCA5(−) group compared to Control(−) group, meanwhile, the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2 expression was elevated in Circ-SMARCA5(+) group than that in Control(+) group but reduced in Circ-SMARCA5(−) group compared to Control(−) group. Conclusions: Circ-SMARCA5 is overexpressed, and promotes cell proliferation, migration and invasion, but represses apoptosis in bladder cancer.
Background
To help with the clinical practice of renal cancer patients, prognostic models are urgently warranted. We hunted and identified prognostic variables associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS) for renal cancer patients.
Patients and Methods
In this retrospective study, 187 renal cancer patients who had received curative radical/partial nephrectomy between November 2011 and January 2017 were enrolled in the current study. These patients were randomly split into the training (n = 95) and validation sets (n = 92) by the ratio of 1:1. Univariate and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to establish the nomogram, which was then evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and Kaplan-Meier (K-M) analyses.
Results
Patient characteristics and outcomes were well balanced between the training and validation sets; the median RFS values were 54.1 months and 58.9 months for the training and validation cohorts, respectively. The final nomogram included six independent prognostic variables (prothrombin time (%), prothrombin time (second), albumin/globulin ratio, platelets, sex and fibrinogen). The mean values of RFS for the low- and high-risk groups defined by a prognostic formula were 56.22 ± 18.50 months and 49.54 ± 23.57 months, respectively, in the training cohort and were 59.00 ± 19.50 months and 53.32 ± 19.95 months, respectively, in the validation cohort. The significance and stability of the model were tested by the time-dependent K-M model and ROC curves, respectively.
Conclusion
Our validated prognostic model incorporates variables routinely collected from renal cancer patients, identifying subsets of patients with different survival outcomes, which provides useful information for patient care and clinical trial design.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.